Talk:Chestnut-bellied sandgrouse

Birds Low‑importance

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Birds To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Wikify : Ninox boobook ocellata • The Institute for Bird Populations (more)
Other : Add photos to bird articles needing photos (search Flickr for free images

). Add taxonomic authorities to genus articles.

More outstanding tasks at the project's cleanup listing, Category:Birds articles needing attention, and Wikipedia:WikiProject Birds/Todo.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Chestnut-bellied sandgrouse. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060928131223/http://www.stlzoo.org/animals/abouttheanimals/birds/pigeonsdoves/chestnutbelliedsandgrouse.htm to http://www.stlzoo.org/animals/abouttheanimals/birds/pigeonsdoves/chestnutbelliedsandgrouse.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{

Sourcecheck

}}).

This message was posted before February 2018.

regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check

}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:15, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Suggestions for continued improvement

Nice job on the additions you've made so far, KyleA94. I'm not sure how much more you have to do for your class, but here are some ideas of things to research if you want to bump this up to a B or higher.

Taxonomy

Who first described the species? When? Did he give it its current name, or something else?
Do we know where the type specimen was collected? Or where it is now? (i.e which museum?)
How many species are in the same genus? Do we know which the chestnut-bellied is most closely related to?
What is the etymology of its scientific name? (James Jobling's book -- available online -- is a great resource for this.)
Think about adding the date and describer for each subspecies; those are available here

Description

Length? Weight? Wingspan? Are males bigger?
You mention that there are six subspecies twice. You might rework this section a bit to describe the nominate subspecies first; that's standard, since that was the first subspecies described to science. Then describe the differences between that subspecies and the others.
Do we know what chicks and immature birds look like?
Are there any similar species that it might be confused with?

Habitat and range

Is there a range map available on Wikimedia Commons?
It would be good to delimit the range with actual country names. For instance, the eastern edge of their range is now said to be "western and southern Asia", but I have no idea where exactly that ends.

Behaviour

Do we know anything about their songs and calls?
Link to the xeno-canto website (using the {{Birdsong}} template) so readers can hear them.
Do they carry water to their chicks in their breast feathers, like other Pterocles sandgrouse do?
Are all subspecies sedentary? Or just some?
There's no information about their current conservation status. Are they endangered anywhere? Declining? If so, why? We typically explain their IUCN status and why they're so rated.

Feel free to ping me if you have any questions! MeegsC (talk) 12:46, 5 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]