Talk:Chinese variety art

This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

China Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject China, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of China related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChinaWikipedia:WikiProject ChinaTemplate:WikiProject ChinaChina-related articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. Circus High‑importance This article is within the scope of the WikiProject Circus. If you would like to participate please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.CircusWikipedia:WikiProject CircusTemplate:WikiProject CircusCircus articles High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Can we cut the woke BS please? In English it's called Chinese circus, period. Human acrobatics and other similar elements always were and always will be called circus in this language. Each region, country, culture has its own specific characteristics, some more universal and some less. If we would need to invent new terms for each local variety of common, well-established vernacular words, we'd end up like the Japanese of WWII, who hardly understood a word of their emperor's capitulation speech, because he spoke "court Japanese". We're enforcing a self-inflicted, secular