Talk:Circular Quay

This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Australia: New South Wales / Sydney Low‑importance Circular Quay is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject New South Wales (assessed as Low-importance). This article is supported by WikiProject Sydney (assessed as High-importance). Need help improving this article? Ask a LibrarianWhat's this? at the National Library of Australia, or the State Library of New South Wales. The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance. Travel and Tourism Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Travel and Tourism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of travel and tourism related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Travel and TourismWikipedia:WikiProject Travel and TourismTemplate:WikiProject Travel and TourismTourism articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Stong don't merge - I don't know who proposed this - you don't give me much time - I'm making a template for all the ferry wharves in Sydney (commuter ones anyway) to have a good record of entries of ferry wharves in Sydney. If this is merged it will stuff up all my formatting. This page will have all the ferry information which doesn't belong in the geographical area article, which can incorporate a lot more (stuff like the Toaster, Opera House, Overseas Passenger Terminal, the MCA, Customs House, etc.) Please don't merge. (

It's been a week - and no one has even written a merge proposal. I'm removing this tag and leaving this article. (

JROBBO 13:07, 10 June 2006 (UTC))[reply

]

berbat bir site —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.213.198.45 (talk) 09:16, 25 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on

• Attempted to fix sourcing for http://haveyoursay.nsw.gov.au/document/show/601

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{

This message was posted before February 2018.

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—

Hi all - this image in the article has no description or reference back to the article. It's not representative of Circular Quay in a previous or its current form. Relevance to the article subject should be established and provided in the image caption, and appropriate info in the article text...if indeed it is relevant. thank you --Merbabu (talk) 01:44, 8 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ah - there is a block of un-referenced text about proposals - hmmm, there have always been proposals to change Circular Quay. I wonder whether these are self-promotional? Undue weight? --Merbabu (talk) 01:50, 8 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Urrghh - that whole section is a mess. Largely unreferenced. see

WP:SOURCE

Would be good to hear comment from others. I might start addressing these issues soon if time permits. --Merbabu (talk) 01:59, 8 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Worth raising as an item on Wikipedia:Australian Wikipedians' notice board. Fleet Lists (talk) 02:07, 8 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

It could be someone confusing the article "Circular Quay" with an article about quays that are circular. Idk maybe a stupid interpretation. IWI (chat) 04:57, 9 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

More likely a proposal though, that is clear. The lack of context in the caption is confusing. IWI (chat) 04:59, 9 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Update

So, i just went in and removed most of the offending material. diffs Seems to be a vanity write up by a non-notable architect. The controversial East Circular development was indeed a significant period in the history, and I'm not saying that my new pared-back description is ideal (far from it), but it's better than the NPOV, poorly referenced, self promotional material. --Merbabu (talk) 00:12, 23 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Interseting pic of west circular quay with old Commissariat building before the MSB/MCA building. Free to upload and use on wikipedia if anyone has the time: https://archives.cityofsydney.nsw.gov.au/nodes/view/713793 --Merbabu (talk) 10:28, 12 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]