Talk:Citation analysis

Science Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Science, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Science on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ScienceWikipedia:WikiProject ScienceTemplate:WikiProject Sciencescience articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

i want to know more on citation analysis

I agree that this page should be merged with Citation index and possibly Citation impact. Peteruetz (talk) 17:17, 4 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Citation Analysis is not the same as Citation Impact Analysis:

Citation Analysis is much more than measuring 'impact' of those citations. The analysis of citations over short, mid and long-term can tell us much about the narrative and evolution of scientific ideas, scientific schools/groups etc.

I agree the current Citation Analysis article lacks original thought/content compared to the proposed merger pages, but a merger is not going to address the real issue that the article itself has a conceptually narrow view of 'Citation analysis'. --Dr.S.A.Knight (talk) 02:58, 27 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on

• Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20120404021358/http://ieeexplore.ieee.org:80/search/wrapper.jsp?arnumber=5070630&tag=1 to http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/search/wrapper.jsp?arnumber=5070630&tag=1

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{

This message was posted before February 2018.

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—

I have just modified one external link on Citation analysis. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120703221100/http://hudsonlegalblog.com:80/e-discovery/e-discovery-special-report-rising-tide-nonlinear-review.html to http://hudsonlegalblog.com/e-discovery/e-discovery-special-report-rising-tide-nonlinear-review.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{

This message was posted before February 2018.

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:52, 25 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]