Talk:Citizens' assemblies of the Roman Republic

This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Classical Greece and Rome Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Classical Greece and Rome, a group of contributors interested in Wikipedia's articles on classics. If you would like to join the WikiProject or learn how to contribute, please see our project page. If you need assistance from a classicist, please see our talk page.Classical Greece and RomeWikipedia:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeTemplate:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeClassical Greece and Rome articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. Politics Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Shouldn't the Latin name be Res Publica Romanorum ('common property of the Romans')? Kuralyov 02:56, 21 Dec 2004 (UTC)

• As opposed to what, exactly? I've always seen it as the Res Publica Romana myself.--CaesarGJ 04:58, 1 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The section had some sort of markup error that caused the text to not wrap but scroll far out horizontally. Additonally, the first sentence was missing an article -- 'A'.

The very bottom of the article (just below the "see also" link to the Roman constitution) has the text "sdfsdfsdf" which doesn't show up when I try to edit it. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.241.198.109 (talk) 11:01, 18 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This page appears to have fallen into neglect. I moved this page from

See my comments on the Senate of the Roman Republic talk page. I don't think that you can get rid of the Roman assemblies page. But it does need to be shortened substantially. Wikidea 17:52, 9 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I just wanted to mention my plans for my series on the Roman constitution. There was simply too much information to put on my original page, Constitution of the Roman Republic. There is also a significant amount of information available on the constitutions of the Roman kingdom and empire. Therefore, I am going to give this series somewhat of a matrix structure. Roman Constitution will be the main page of the series. Underneath this page will be Constitution of the Roman Kingdom, Constitution of the Roman Republic and Constitution of the Roman Empire. It surprised me, but apparently there actually was a constitution during the time of the kingdom and then again during the time of the empire.

Underneath the constitution pages, I will have pages on the

When this is done, I will create a new page called

My hope is to use a discussion and analysis format for the entire series. My overall goal will be to produce a series that doesn't just discuss the facts associated with these offices and institutions. I want the series to tie everything together, and illustrate how everything operated under the overall constitutional system. Right now, the entries on these individual topics (such as roman consul and praetor) simply list facts without providing any deeper analysis or context. It is difficult to truly understand these topics unless you know how they all worked together under the constitutional system.

Also, I am not surprised that there hasn't been more work done on Wikipedia on this topic. It seems as though there are very few books on this subject, and many of those books are quite old. This is unfortunate because this subject is actually quite relevant to modern politics. Many modern governments are designed around a similar constitutional superstructure as was the Roman government. RomanHistorian (talk) 07:22, 15 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I have redone this entry, and integrated it into my series on the Roman Constitution. Before my change, 95% of this entry was about the assemblies of the Roman Republic. There was nothing on the assemblies of the Roman Kingdom, and hardly anything on the assemblies of the Roman Empire. The nature of the assemblies, in particular the plebeian form of the Assembly of the Tribes and the Assembly of the Curiae was poorly described before these changes. There was hardly any information about the Comitia Tributa, and almost nothing about the Concilium Plebis. Some of the information (such as the assemblies being abandoned after the reign of the emperor Caligula) was factually incorrect.RomanHistorian (talk) 08:17, 19 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This review is

Talk:Legislative Assemblies of the Roman Republic/GA1

. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

• References needed:
  • "On several known occasions, "
  • "Consuls always presided over the assembly."
  • "While the voters in this assembly wore..."
  • "During a vote, all of the Centuries..."
  • "Now, majorities usually could not be reached until the third class of enlisted Centuries had begun voting."
  • "This mass disenfranchisement of most of the soldiers in the army played an important role in the chaos that led to the fall of the Roman Republic in 27 BC."
  • "During his dictatorship from 82 BC until 80 BC" paragraph
  • "The Tribal Assembly also had the power to try judicial cases."
  • "Once a majority of Tribes had voted the same way, voting ended."
  • "The only difference between the Plebeian Council after 471 BC..."
  • "However, in 449 BC a law was passed which gave Plebiscites ..."
• Make less columns in See also and Notes; they don't currently span the full page width.
• "Further reading" last name ascending order
• Collapse both navigation boxes at the bottom of the page

I have made all of these changes, with the exception of the column issue. I don't see any difference between this section here, and the equivalent section on Senate of the Roman Republic. Therefore, I do not understand what needs to be changed, or how to do it. RomanHistorian (talk) 23:17, 20 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Could you also make the similar changes to this article as I have suggested for the others? For instance, some of the images are wider than 50% of the screen (on 1024x768 monitors). And en dashes are needed in a few places.

talk) 23:21, 20 September 2008 (UTC)[reply

]

Done. RomanHistorian (talk) 01:54, 21 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I second to that.

Nergaal (talk) 06:39, 21 September 2008 (UTC)[reply

]

Passing

talk) 18:46, 26 September 2008 (UTC)[reply

]

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20111106175219/http://mailer.fsu.edu/~njumonvi/montesquieu_romans.htm to http://mailer.fsu.edu/~njumonvi/montesquieu_romans.htm
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080829134354/http://www.uah.edu/student_life/organizations/SAL/texts/misc/romancon.html to http://www.uah.edu/student_life/organizations/SAL/texts/misc/romancon.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018.

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:34, 13 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]