Talk:Coat of arms of Dresden

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Heraldry and vexillology Coat of arms of Dresden is within the scope of the Heraldry and vexillology WikiProject, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of heraldry and vexillology. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.Heraldry and vexillologyWikipedia:WikiProject Heraldry and vexillologyTemplate:WikiProject Heraldry and vexillologyheraldry and vexillology articles Germany Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Germany, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Germany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GermanyWikipedia:WikiProject GermanyTemplate:WikiProject GermanyGermany articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This page was created because the main page Dresden is too long. The context is the main page. Mootros (talk) 15:25, 28 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Page has notability as it is a coat of arms of a real place as per

WP:NOTABILITY RP459 (talk) 18:50, 28 September 2009 (UTC)[reply

]

It should be merged with

talk) 23:14, 28 September 2009 (UTC)[reply

]

I quote from Coat_of_arms "In the Nordic countries, provinces, regions, cities and municipalities have a coat of arms. These are posted to the borders and shown in official documents advertising the area." RP459 (talk) 23:29, 28 September 2009 (UTC) as such I have reverted your edits...[reply]

They have "coats of arms" but they are not sufficiently notable, unlike personal or family arms, or even "state arms".

talk) 23:31, 28 September 2009 (UTC)[reply

]

Do you have a link where cities coats of arms have been decided to not be

WP:Notable? RP459 (talk) 23:33, 28 September 2009 (UTC)[reply

]

As I said, they are merely the arms of a city. They may be created but they serve no special purpose. It would not matter if

talk) 23:39, 28 September 2009 (UTC)[reply

]

Where to draw the line? Does this mean for example the

Wikipedias is not a paper encyclopedia. As always, Yours, Mootros (talk) 16:25, 29 September 2009 (UTC)[reply

]

I noticed that this article had been removed from stubs does that mean that it is believed to be start class? I honestly believe it to still be a stub. RP459 (talk) 14:00, 29 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

A class of any kind assumes it should really be an article, which hasn't been determined yet.

talk) 15:00, 29 September 2009 (UTC)[reply

]

I'll add that instead of warring like this, you could try and find sources to improve and expand the article if possible. If you can move it towards the appearance of

talk) 15:25, 29 September 2009 (UTC)[reply

]

I've looked around, and think you may have trouble finding enough text out there to really base a substantial article on, but at least the site I've added allows their images to be used at Wikipedia, as it says at the bottom of the page.

talk) 15:39, 29 September 2009 (UTC)[reply

]

That sounds fair thanks for clarifying, I will not revert :) RP459 (talk) 17:04, 29 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

No discussion has occurred with regards to the proposed merge as such I have re-stubbed... RP459 (talk) 18:49, 12 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hopefully I won't be blocked for first reverting the use of free content and then reverting my reversion, both of which are

I see no reason for being blocked. I've edited the intro accordingly. Thanks for your great effort! Mootros (talk) 16:46, 29 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for removing the proposed merge from this page, I can see no reason why the page should be merged back into Dresden. RP459 (talk) 19:29, 11 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, good! Mootros (talk) 19:45, 11 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]