Talk:Combe Hill, East Sussex

Combe Hill, East Sussex is a featured article; it (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Wikipedia community. Even so, if you can update or improve it, please do so.

This article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on January 11, 2023.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
April 29, 2022	Featured article candidate	Promoted

UK geography Low‑importance

	how to write about settlements.UK geographyWikipedia:WikiProject UK geographyTemplate:WikiProject UK geographyUK geography articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

England Low‑importance

	England portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject EnglandTemplate:WikiProject EnglandEngland-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Sussex Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sussex, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Sussex on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SussexWikipedia:WikiProject SussexTemplate:WikiProject SussexSussex-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Archaeology Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Archaeology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Archaeology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchaeologyWikipedia:WikiProject ArchaeologyTemplate:WikiProject ArchaeologyArchaeology articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

On 20 March 2022, it was proposed that this article be moved from Coombe Hill, East Sussex to Combe Hill. The result of the discussion was moved.

Requested move 20 March 2022

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: moved. (

talk) 06:55, 9 April 2022 (UTC)[reply

]

Coombe Hill, East Sussex → Combe Hill – Reliable sources are divided between "Coombe Hill" and "Combe Hill"; a Google Books search shows a slight preference among recent works for "Combe Hill". In addition, the hill is primarily known for the archaeological site on it, which is almost always spelled "Combe Hill" in the sources that discuss it. Examples include Hadrian Allcroft (1908) Earthwork of England; both excavation reports, in Sussex Archaeological Collections (1950 and 1994), titled "An Excavation at Combe Hill Camp Near Eastbourne August 1949" and "Dr V. Seton Williams' excavations at Combe Hill, 1962, and the role of Neolithic causewayed enclosures in Sussex"; Curwen (1954) The Archaeology of Sussex; Oswald et al.'s The Creation of Monuments (2001), a survey of all British causewayed enclosures, and Whittle et al. (2011) Gathering Time, a survey of radiocarbon dates of Neolithic enclosures. There's currently a redirect at Combe Hill, which has no significant history and I think can be overwritten. Mike Christie (talk - contribs - library) 18:02, 20 March 2022 (UTC)[reply

]

Support I'd considered making a request last year when I created the Commons category since the Ordnance Survey uses this spelling. Crouch, Swale (talk) 09:53, 22 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.