Talk:Complementary and Integrated Medicine Research Unit, University of Southampton

This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Alternative medicine This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Alternative medicine, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Alternative medicine related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Alternative medicineWikipedia:WikiProject Alternative medicineTemplate:WikiProject Alternative medicineAlternative medicine articles Hampshire Low‑importance This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Hampshire, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Hampshire on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HampshireWikipedia:WikiProject HampshireTemplate:WikiProject HampshireHampshire articles Low This redirect has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. article guideline for useful advice.Higher educationWikipedia:WikiProject Higher educationTemplate:WikiProject Higher educationHigher education articles

This statement, "It received a 4* rating in the Research Assessment Exercise of 2008,[3] indicating that most of its research is of international importance", misrepresents the source. The 2008 RAE did not individually evaluate the Complementary Medicine Research Unit. All that is available are grade point averages for each unit of assessment. Southampton University gives a list of these average scores per unit of assessment (see here), note that nowhere is the Complementary Medicine Research Unit mentioned, so it cannot be attributed an individual score. None of the medical units of assessment have a higher averaged score than 3.25 (if you include nursing, 3.10 otherwise). The Unit did not receive a 4* rating by any measure included in the RAE.92.18.35.112 (talk) 21:55, 22 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Several sentences are near identical to sentences in an unattributed introduction on the Complementary Medicine Research Unit website e.g. "One in ten of the UK population use complementary medicine each year and approximately 50% are lifetime users" is an exact copy.92.18.35.112 (talk) 22:53, 22 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The statement, "The unit has produced over 200 papers and publications since 2001.³", is not supported by the citation. The linked page makes no claim of "over 200 papers", rather it lists 13 publications, the earliest of which is from 2002. Thus removed.92.18.35.112 (talk) 00:22, 23 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The current article title, "Complementary medicine research unit, University of Southampton", is incorrect as well as lacking the proper capitalization. The actual name is the Complementary and Integrated Medicine Research Unit, per the official website. I cannot change this having not registered an account, so it would be appreciated if someone else would do so. 92.18.35.112 (talk) 00:22, 24 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110907105257/http://www.cam-research-group.co.uk/cam_use_res.php to http://www.cam-research-group.co.uk/cam_use_res.php
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110908032033/http://www.cam-research-group.co.uk/methodology_res.php to http://www.cam-research-group.co.uk/methodology_res.php

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018.

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:50, 11 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]