Talk:Congress of the Union

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Mexico Top‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Mexico, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Mexico on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MexicoWikipedia:WikiProject MexicoTemplate:WikiProject MexicoMexico articles Top This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale. Politics Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

An image used in this article, File:Logo Convergencia.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion at Wikimedia Commons for the following reason: Copyright violations What should I do? Don't panic; deletions can take a little longer at Commons than they do on Wikipedia. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion (although please review Commons guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page. If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use) If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used. If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Commons Undeletion Request This notification is provided by a Bot -- talk) 19:10, 31 August 2011 (UTC)[reply ]

An image used in this article, File:Logo Partido Verde.png, has been nominated for speedy deletion at Wikimedia Commons for the following reason: Copyright violations What should I do? Don't panic; deletions can take a little longer at Commons than they do on Wikipedia. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion (although please review Commons guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page. If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use) If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used. If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Commons Undeletion Request This notification is provided by a Bot -- talk) 19:10, 31 August 2011 (UTC)[reply ]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Congress of the Union. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Corrected formatting/usage for http://foros.elsiglodetorreon.com.mx/politica/336233-2+mil+312+millones+para+sueldos+de+senadores+y+diputados+en+2010.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20111203030718/http://www.diputados.gob.mx/LeyesBiblio/marjur/marco/Dip_manual_remun_28feb11.pdf to http://www.diputados.gob.mx/LeyesBiblio/marjur/marco/Dip_manual_remun_28feb11.pdf

Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:01, 29 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Congress of the Union. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110823081417/http://www.eleccion2012mexico.com/project-definition to http://www.eleccion2012mexico.com/project-definition
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110823081417/http://www.eleccion2012mexico.com/project-definition to http://www.eleccion2012mexico.com/project-definition

Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:30, 12 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Congress of the Union. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20031014004128/http://info4.juridicas.unam.mx/ijure/fed/9/62.htm to http://info4.juridicas.unam.mx/ijure/fed/9/62.htm

Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:40, 4 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Just a question.... the date of establishment is listed as 1821... but there appears to be contradictory information. The date listed seems to refer to the "Mexican Empire" not the current Congress of the Union - that seems to have been reestablished under the newest constitution of 1917. Were there multiple congresses? Or was congress maintained, while the government structure was changed? IE legislature maintained while executive/judicail etc.. branches were altered. It seems that there were multiple states with distinct congresses, under different constitutions. Any clarification? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 189.176.65.145 (talk) 19:07, 24 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]