Talk:Constitutional economics
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
Dr. Streb's comment on this article
Dr. Streb has reviewed this Wikipedia page, and provided us with the following comments to improve its quality:
The article needs proof-reading. The second paragraph of the introduction belongs to a later section or to a footnote (I moved it to the end of the introduction, so now it is the third paragraph). The material is not well-organized by sections. General material is mixed up with very specific references.
We hope Wikipedians on this talk page can take advantage of these comments and improve the quality of the article accordingly.
Dr. Streb has published scholarly research which seems to be relevant to this Wikipedia article:
- Reference : Jorge M. Streb & Gustavo F. Torrens, 2009. "Making rules credible: Divided government and political budget cycles," CEMA Working Papers: Serie Documentos de Trabajo. 395, Universidad del CEMA.
ExpertIdeasBot (talk) 11:15, 28 May 2016 (UTC)
External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Constitutional economics. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060518093905/http://www.econlib.org:80/LIBRARY/Buchanan/buchCv7Contents.html to http://www.econlib.org/library/Buchanan/buchCv7Contents.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
{{source check
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:09, 30 November 2016 (UTC)