Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Economics

This is the talk page for discussing WikiProject Economics and anything related to its purposes and tasks.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

WT:ECON

Archives: Index, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10: 3 months

WikiProject Economics was featured in a WikiProject Report in the Signpost on 19 December 2011.

The Center on Race, Poverty and the Environment

Perhaps someone from this WikiProject could take a look at

WP:NPP. -- Marchjuly (talk) 01:04, 2 December 2024 (UTC)[reply

]

I think either

WP:WikiProject Environmentalism should be more helpful here; the topic seems only tangentially related to economics. – Closed Limelike Curves (talk) 17:37, 22 February 2025 (UTC)[reply

]

Built-in inflation

This timely topic's article has not been sourced in-5 years. Let's find and add reliable sources to this. It's possible that many of our core users will come here looking for secondary sources. Bearian (talk) 17:58, 29 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hmm, looks like it needs a merge with inertial inflation.– Closed Limelike Curves (talk) 22:21, 29 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I've proposed that. Bearian (talk) 01:56, 11 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Competitor indexing

This stub has been unsourced for 15 years. Can somebody please find and add reliable sources to it? Bearian (talk) 02:04, 4 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Ed Yardeni

I just created Ed Yardeni. It may be of interest to members of this project. Thriley (talk) 19:54, 18 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Should section Trade route#Maritime Jade Road be blanked?

Your feedback would be appreciated at Talk:Trade route#Should section Maritime Jade Road be blanked?. Mathglot (talk) 22:52, 21 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Good article reassessment for Trade route

Trade route has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 20:33, 25 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Top Five Journals in Economics

Could some knowledgeable editors have a look at this? Is this Top Five a "thing" or just the subject of a research article? Comments welcome! Thanks, --Randykitty (talk) 14:00, 3 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

It's a "thing" (see here). – Closed Limelike Curves (talk) 16:58, 8 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Central bankers that became national leaders

Is there a list of these?

Mario Draghi (Governor of the Bank of Italy -> Prime Minister of Italy)
Mark Carney (Governor of the Bank of Canada, England, World Financial Stability Board -> Prime Minister of Canada)
others?

-- 65.92.246.77 (talk) 23:06, 11 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think there should be such a list, as it is arbitrary to combine a few characteristics into a SQL search query. E.g. billionaires who became millionaires, or finance ministers that served for corruption. --Gunnar (talk) 11:26, 20 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move at Talk:2025 United States trade war with Canada and Mexico#Requested move 4 April 2025

neos • talk • edits) 13:05, 4 April 2025 (UTC)[reply

]

Requested move at Talk:State Socialism (Germany)#Requested move 11 April 2025

TarnishedPath^talk 11:07, 19 April 2025 (UTC)[reply

]

Good article reassessment for Mathematical economics

Mathematical economics has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 16:23, 21 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Good article reassessment for Production–possibility frontier

Production–possibility frontier has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 20:41, 25 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Marginal propensity to import

This unsourced stub appears to be more important than ever. Please add reliable sources . Bearian (talk) 10:07, 5 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Honestly this is so arbitrary that it's better off removed. It's all based on the import function which is basically magic pixie dust. 199.255.150.243 (talk) 13:16, 7 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

And by that I mean the import func follows fiscal policy and not the other way around. Plus no sources. 199.255.150.243 (talk) 13:21, 7 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Good article reassessment for Forward exchange rate

Forward exchange rate has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 15:16, 31 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Universe (economics)

Here's another economics-stub tagged as unsourced for 15 and 1/2 years. This is a chance to win points at Wikipedia:WikiProject Unreferenced articles/Backlog drives/June 2025. Bearian (talk) 21:30, 8 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Nominating a good article reassessment: Modern Monetary Theory

(First timer, I think this is how I should engage but let me know if not.)

The current article needs an overhaul. It does not accurately reflect the position of the school of thought. I believe it would be useful if this project were to help contribute towards improving it. MwikiNpedia (talk) 06:27, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Good article reassessment for Manuel Belgrano

Manuel Belgrano has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 02:11, 1 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Good article reassessment for Feminist economics

Feminist economics has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 17:28, 4 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Good article reassessment for International Development Association

International Development Association has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 17:08, 5 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]