Talk:Cowboy Artists of America
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||
 | Archives of American Art Low‑importance | ||||||
| |||||||
Untitled
I've been trying to figure out how to link this up into the rest of the wikipedia. Right now it only links from the discussion page of Cowboy.
Considering the Cowboy Artists of America have their own museum, have had several books written about them, as well as at least one book/monograph per artist, and the fact that they are collected by many very serious collectors, they should fit into the scheme of things around here.
To be honest, Wikipedia is still very biased and imbalanced with regard to its content...
- And of course you'd rather complain than do something about it, and can't be bothered to sign your criticisms. You might want to list it at ]
Yeah, that's right. I created this page. And pretty much wrote it. I created the page on
I've added to the List of Historical Horses page. And the Western Movies article.
And I've done other stuff.
Just because I didn't sign my name doesn't make my observation not legitimate.
In fact, this comment isn't signed as well. Again, it's the content of the observation that counts.
And because I made the observation and wrote it, you (RickK) came and read it. But instead of helping out yourself, all you did was make an even less constructive observation - ah, but you signed your name, so we know who you are.