Talk:Daniel G. Birmingham

25 June 2007. The result of the discussion

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Biography: Politics and Government

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the politics and government work group (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool as Stub-class because it uses a stub template. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

Proposed Deletion

I removed the propsed deletion tag for two reasons,

1) The concern listed is that the person was non-notable, personally I think being chairman of a county legislature certainly makes you notable.

2) The explanation goes on to say that if the article was improved, the tag should be removed. If a person is non-notable than no amount of improved writing will make them notable. The article does need improvement, but bad writing does not make the person non notable.EMT1871 10:45, 25 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I put the prod in place and I suppose I should explain why. Local politicians are not notable enough for Wikipedia, and I believe this guy counts as a local politician. Also, the "if the article is improved" bit is a standard part of the template. It's there no matter what the reason the prodder gives for deletion and cannot be removed. Since the prod was contested, I'm sending it over to Articles for Deletion and there can be more discussion. RedRollerskate 16:29, 25 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

By the way the tag I removed, which said to remove it if anyone disagreed, also said the tag should not be replaced if removed.EMT1871 20:14, 25 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It was not replaced.

WP:N. RedRollerskate 16:16, 27 June 2007 (UTC)[reply

]