Talk:David A. Andelman

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on David A. Andelman. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018.

regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check
}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:08, 5 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Do we really need this article?

Is this person important enough to warrant an article on Wikipedia? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2604:2000:C64F:300:85C8:E406:A0B5:219B (talk) 18:56, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If it is at all helpful, I came here looking for an article on David Andelman, trying to assess how his education and career might have biased an article he wrote. So he was notable enough for me to come looking for him. Jason Fruit (talk) 14:09, 21 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]


No, he's not notable. I strongly support deletion. ahess247 (talk) 18:25, 16 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Non-notable lead

Terrible lead, practically no reason for this article to exist. ahess247 (talk) 19:10, 30 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

David A. Andelman (born October 6, 1944) is an American journalist, commentator and author.

If that's all it takes for a lead, I could have my own page on Wikipedia. I report, I comment, I write.

In a 1975 letter to Rolling Stone publisher Jann Wenner, the writer and journalist Hunter S. Thompson described Andelman as "...one of those people you'd automatically choose to be plunged into a vat of aboriginal clap-spoor, just to test the effects."

Apparently some editor desperately wanted to put the phrase "clap-spoor" on Wikipedia, and so we got the lead above. (Could it be? Or what else am I missing here?)

My sentiment: either make the lead notable without referencing Hunter S. Thompson's sparkle-pony racist bile, or terminate this article with extreme prejudice. — MaxEnt 13:53, 11 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]