Talk:David Bierk

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the arts and entertainment work group.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on David Bierk. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110526215339/http://www.rca-arc.ca/en/about_members/since1880.asp to http://www.rca-arc.ca/en/about_members/since1880.asp

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{

Sourcecheck

}}).

This message was posted before February 2018.

regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check

}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:08, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted sources in early life section

This is a section to discuss the unknown reason for this edit, which deleted sourcing I had spent some time finding. The "biography" section also does not make sense; all of the article is the biography. Anyway, discuss.

talk) 02:34, 8 March 2020 (UTC)[reply

]

Unfortunately ThatMontreallP would not allow even a few minutes for another user to complete edits without seeing what the ultimate result or purpose would be. It can take a few minutes to merge sections in order to create a more effective narrative. Artslettersperson (talk) 02:47, 8 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This article is already marked as being in poor shape with respect to sources. New unsourced material should not be added; that makes a problem article even worse.

You have sources for the material you're adding? Put them in with your edits. You don't have sources for the material you're adding? Then leave that material out.

You want to spend a period drafting, with an "ultimate result", including sources, later? Please don't use the final article space for that. Use your

sandbox and bring it over when it's fit for article space. Don't draft in mainspace. TJRC (talk) 04:42, 8 March 2020 (UTC)[reply

]

Removal of lists

Exhibitions and collections should be condensed into narrative form and merged with the overall narrative biography. Bullet point lists are inappropriate for an encyclopedia entry. Artslettersperson (talk) 02:45, 8 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Bullet point lists are entirely fine, especially for sections with many items.

talk) 02:48, 8 March 2020 (UTC)[reply

]