Talk:Defense Production Act of 1950

A fact from Defense Production Act of 1950 appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 18 May 2007. The text of the entry was as follows: Did you know... that the aluminum and titanium processing industries in the 1950s? A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2007/May.

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Law This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale. Military history: North America / United States This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status: Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met Associated task forces: /  North American military history task force United States military history task force United States: Government Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject U.S. Government (assessed as Low-importance).

The following references may be useful when improving this article in the future: https://www.npr.org/2020/03/18/818069722/trump-invokes-a-cold-war-relic-the-defense-production-act-for-coronavirus-shorta https://www.wbur.org/onpoint/2020/04/08/defense-production-act-coronavirus

Hi all. It would be useful to have a table with all the various reauthorizations that have occurred including year and pl numbers. I probably won't get to this for a few weeks. A CRS report will probably have it. Cheers --PatrickFlaherty (talk) 20:35, 24 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Shouldn't there be a mention of the Act being used to force chemical companies to supply them with Agent Orange? http://www.dow.com/sustainability/debates/agentorange/ — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.171.165.82 (talk) 09:39, 20 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130817165018/http://guidebook.dcma.mil/38/dpas%20guidebook.htm to http://guidebook.dcma.mil/38/DPAS%20Guidebook.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018.

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:56, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Washington Post is slanted biased reference and the entry is not factual. The president did not state that his invocation had anything to do with Covid-19 2605:E000:151F:C745:48BF:8E4C:F90E:CFD4 (talk) 17:49, 18 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I don't see an article about it, but I feel like there ought to be mention of Canada's Defence Production Act (https://laws-lois.justice.gc.ca/eng/acts/d-1/) (notice the spelling difference). 108.168.18.205 (talk) 14:10, 20 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Probably not. It's a different law in a different jurisdiction, not covered in this article. If there were an article on it, it would be worth a "see also" and/or a disambiguation hat, but there's no reason an article on US legislation should cover the legislation of another country that covers similar ground. TJRC (talk) 15:18, 20 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nonsense, it obviously is similar enough to warrant a disambiguation note at the top.174.130.70.61 (talk) 14:35, 28 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed. Though let’s be friendly and avoid language like nonsense. I’ll put something appropriate in place. And if no one else does, I’ll put a small article in place for the Canadian act later today.

talk) 14:44, 28 March 2020 (UTC)[reply

]

• Kanno-Youngs, Zolan; Swanson, Ana (March 31, 2020). "Wartime Production Law Has Been Used Routinely, but Not With Coronavirus". New York Times. Retrieved 31 March 2020.
  talk) 20:38, 31 March 2020 (UTC)[reply
  ]

One of the references specifically states that "Trump didn't order meat-processing plants to reopen," but the article strongly implies he did, stating, "The order gave the USDA extraordinary powers to have firms maintain production." Which is it? Did Trump force plants to reopen using the Defense Production Act or didn't he? Can someone who is well-versed on this subject please clarify the issue in the text of the article? Thank you. 66.91.36.8 (talk) 13:30, 14 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

It's by far the largest section. I think it should be trimmed down. Ergzay (talk) 20:03, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]