Talk:Deforestation of the Amazon rainforest

Brazil: Geography Mid‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Brazil, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Brazil and related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BrazilWikipedia:WikiProject BrazilTemplate:WikiProject BrazilBrazil articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by the Geography of Brazil task force (assessed as Mid-importance).

Climate change High‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Climate change, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Climate change on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Climate changeWikipedia:WikiProject Climate changeTemplate:WikiProject Climate changeClimate change articles High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale. If you are looking for ways to improve this article, we recommend checking out our recommended sources and our style guide

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 27 August 2019 and 6 December 2019. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Vleon208. Peer reviewers: Joelonex, Tcvpilipina, Emily.Potter2198, Keirasullivan, Kayla.Bellan, Julian0217.

Above undated message substituted from

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 6 September 2019 and 12 December 2019. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Sophie007007.

Above undated message substituted from

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 3 September 2020 and 16 December 2020. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Kitbrooks. Peer reviewers: Teddieursa, Magicccfff.

Above undated message substituted from

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 7 January 2019 and 9 April 2019. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Fls098.

Above undated message substituted from

Would really add to the appreciation of the information...and seems like a basic need Avram Primack (talk) 18:24, 14 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

A satalite image showing already deforested areas and areas being deforested now and a scale in kilometers and miles at the bottom, would help people understand this better.Provocateur (talk)

• This article needs to be rewritten from a neutral point of view. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tigerjojo98 (talk • contribs) 14:10, 18 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• A neutral point of view would indicate how much rainforest has been eliminated and at what rate and would provide photos and maps showing the deforestation.

Why doesn't the chart have information based off of the year 2019 that we are currently living in? SierraWebb (talk) 16:05, 3 October 2019 (UTC)Sierra WebbSierraWebb (talk) 16:05, 3 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

There is now a section titled "Optimistic outlook" that is a completely uncited and unsubstantiated counterargument to the idea of Amazon Rainforest deforestation. There is not only an obvious bias to the language, but the very premise has no place in this article (or on wikipedia in general), unless the author can supply good evidence that it may be true. As it stands, it appears to be nothing more than denialism. Druep (talk) 03:40, 16 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I somehow cannot verify this using basic arithmetic and the figures given in the WP article's table (I don't have access to the source of the statement itself): In 2007, we have ~3,387,000 km² rain forest remaining, and an annual loss of 11,500 km². In two decades, you would then lose an additional 2 x 10 x 11,500 km² or 230,000 km² and end up at 3,387,000 - 230,000 km² = 3,157,000 km², which is still 77% (= 3,157,000 km² / 4,100,000 km²) of the 1970 starting area, or a 23% loss -- a far cry from the 40% loss claimed.

If the figures in the statement's source (Scott Wallace, 2007, Last of the Amazon, National Geographic magazine, 2007 issue, pp. 40-71, January 2007) are significantly different from those in the WP table, I think it's worth a mention.

What do you think, everyone?

Best, --Georgepauljohnringo (talk) 20:25, 4 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

" ... and its suppliers were then responsible for 70,000 km² of the Amazon's deforestation in the preceding three years." -- according to the WP table, the total Amazon deforestation for 2003, 2004 and 2005 was just over 70,000 km²; which would mean that McD and Co were responsible for the entire Amazon deforestation in these three years. This seems worthy of verification to me, does someone have access to the original Greenpeace source? They might have a larger overall figure for deforestation, which puts the statement in perspective and should be added to the WP article, in my opinion.

Thanks for your help! --Georgepauljohnringo (talk) 20:32, 4 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This abuse of the McDonald's was a famous troll in the relative early years of the Internet as forum use grew. If there is any listing of the people who have had an hand in the destruction of Amazonia or in any other impact related environment, a source to these places should be pointed out.

82.5.153.175 (talk) 01:05, 31 May 2016 (UTC) Weatherlawyer[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Deforestation of the Amazon rainforest. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131002492200/http://www.whrc.org/news/pressroom/PR-2013-Coe-IOP-ERL_No-win_situation_for_agricultural_expansion_in_the_Amazon.html to http://www.whrc.org/news/pressroom/PR-2013-Coe-IOP-ERL_No-win_situation_for_agricultural_expansion_in_the_Amazon.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018.

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:43, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Graphs are unavailable due to technical issues. There is more info on Phabricator and on MediaWiki.org.

Leo1pard (talk) 16:47, 14 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Cbrittain10: I don't understand this cleanup tag: how can this article's tone or style be improved? Jarble (talk) 15:33, 5 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]