Talk:Delaware Route 62

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
Good articleDelaware Route 62 has been listed as one of the Engineering and technology good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
February 10, 2012Good article nomineeListed

GA Review

This review is . The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Imzadi1979 (talk · contribs) 16:34, 10 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

here
for what they are not)

Dabs and ELs look good.

  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): b (
    lists
    )
    :
    Looks good.
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references): b (citations to
    reliable sources): c (OR
    ):
    Looks good as well.
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
    Given the length of this highway, the content could be padded slightly with the AADT and NHS information.
  4. It follows the
    neutral point of view
    policy
    .
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
    Rare to see otherwise in highway articles.
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have
    suitable captions
    )
    :
    I fixed the caption for you because it wasn't a full sentence, it didn't need a period.
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:
    I'm passing, but still recommending that the above suggestion be implemented. Imzadi 1979  17:19, 10 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]