Talk:Directive on the legal protection of biotechnological inventions
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
Examples of lobby
The tone of the section "Examples of lobby" looks pretty much biased against the directive and against any pro-directive lobbying. The section favours conspiracy interpretations without presenting other possible interpretations. --Edcolins 06:47, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
- I've shortened it a bit, if there is additional perspectives add them. NPOV tag removed. - RoyBoy 04:15, 17 December 2011 (UTC)
Lack of major information
So, here we can follow all the process for the aproval and amendment of the Directive, but it lacks the principal information: What does this directive recommends? —The preceding
- Indeed. Good point. I have just added a header section "Content". Thank you for your suggestion! When you feel an article needs improvement, please feel free to make those changes. Wikipedia is a New contributors are always welcome. --Edcolins 20:26, 13 March 2007 (UTC)]
External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to 2 external links on
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/20070819165356/http://www.curia.europa.eu/en/actu/activites/act01/0125en.htm to http://www.curia.europa.eu/en/actu/activites/act01/0125en.htm#ToC1
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/20061010131657/http://www.etiskraad.dk/sw475.asp to http://www.etiskraad.dk/sw475.asp
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018.
{{source check
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—