Talk:Drawbridge, California

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

In which county?

According to the USGS Geographic Names Information System, Drawbridge is within Alameda County, not Santa Clara County, although it's very close to the border. But I don't have time right now to change both the county name and the reference to "one of two ghost towns in the county," given that it's not really in "the county" but in the one to the north. I would be curious to know of other ghost towns in Alameda County, though.

And what's the deal with the reference to the "Murky News"? Isn't the newspaper nicknamed that for reasons other than its reporting on Drawbridge? The paragraph sounds like editorialization. Michael Patrick 15:05, 13 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed. The refs I added today say that Coyote Slough is the county line and that Drawbridge is just to the north. Have to check to make sure that it's not in Fremont city limits now. Article needs more about use of the site, salt ponds, etc.--Hjal 16:05, 3 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Turn bridge

"For years after the turn bridge drawbridges were removed..."

I think the 'turn bridges' refered to in this sentence are swing bridges, but this should be confirmed. ike9898 (talk) 08:50, 24 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Drawbridge, California. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{

Sourcecheck
}}).

This message was posted before February 2018.

regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check
}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:05, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]