Talk:Eddy Temple-Morris
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Delete?
I'm considering adding this page to the AfD, I'm not sure the subject is notable enough to warrant a wiki article. Thoughts? HumbleGod 19:00, 4 July 2006 (UTC)
- He was a presenter on MTV UK in the late 90s. Should be notable enough, I'll see what I can find. Oldelpaso 20:59, 4 July 2006 (UTC)
Is this the guy from 21st Century Planet Smashers? It's an electronic music artist, might be the same person. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.241.193.18 (talk) 16:06, 17 April 2009 (UTC)
Vandalism
I'm just throwing in the option of protecting this article but as the anon IP is banned for 24 hours it might not be worth it, although there has been a lot of other anon edits ranging from the childish to those making serious allegations so it might be worth considering as a longer term solution. As this vandalism is similar to previous edits from SPAs e.g. and it might be worth running this past
]- Another account has been making similar allegations on another page [1] which are very similar to the claims being made by the anon IP [2] and other accounts [3] [4], especially in connection to Eddy TM [5]. Thoughts? (Emperor (talk) 00:06, 30 June 2010 (UTC))
- More repeated attempts at WP:BLP-violating content from the same IP [6], [7] and [8]. Seems like protecting the page is an idea. (Emperor (talk) 13:48, 1 July 2010 (UTC))]
- Removed link addition [9] - it is a blog which seems to draw on a forum for its details and can't be considered a WP:BLP as it is a serious accusation. The piece does also use a reliable source [10] but that only seems to cover the early part of the article and nothing connected to this article. If there were reliable source then this might be worth a mention over on Hyman's article as long as it is carefully worded because this seems to be an ongoing issue where nothing has been decided definitively (more serious allegations with better sources haven't been included in articles when nothing came of such investigations. Where BLP is concerned you have to be very careful what you say). (Emperor (talk))
- Removed link addition [9] - it is a blog which seems to draw on a forum for its details and can't be considered a