Talk:Edith González

This  level-5 vital article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Women This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WomenWikipedia:WikiProject WomenTemplate:WikiProject WomenWikiProject Women articles Biography: Actors and Filmmakers This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles This article is supported by WikiProject Actors and Filmmakers (assessed as Low-importance). Mexico Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Mexico, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Mexico on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MexicoWikipedia:WikiProject MexicoTemplate:WikiProject MexicoMexico articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

The source for this paragraph comes from the Spanish article Bebé de Edith González, fruto de inseminación artificial. That article translates as:

It is now being said (by no credited reliable source) that her baby was conceived by articial insemination and that each week the rumor is growing stronger that the baby belongs to a former presidential candidate who is not named in the article.

This is rumor built upon innuendo and should not be in the bio of a living person. While her pregnancy is mentioned in her IMDb article, there is no reference to this there. Morenooso 05:55, 31 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

There are too many links to fansites on this bio. Many are Tripod sites with one Tripod site that claims to be her official site but then changes to a fansite when the link is clicked. Foros is Spanish for forum or a talkpage for fans to post comments upon the subject. Often they are not policed. Even the Argentinean site on one of her shows, Corazón salvaje (1993 TV series) has a link to videos which may violate copyright statuses.

This set of links needs to be weedwhacked down to three or four reputable sites. Morenooso 06:17, 31 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your good efforts. It is better to simply have a stub of a living person if reliable sources cannot be basis of the article. The fansite is not a reliable source, so I had to remove all info based upon it per WP:BLP. CyberAnth 06:46, 1 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Actually "foros" is the plural of foro, the Spanish word for forum. It will be tough to find reliable sources on telenovelas and telenovela actors which are neither gossip (chisme) or primary sources. Wikipedia has this policy vs. primary sources as if when one views an episode of a telenovela then one should not be able to write what one saw on Wikipedia. Example, in Doña Barabara Gonzalez kisses Meier. So if one writes on that telenovela, then one theoretically cannot cite (e.g.) Capitulo 37 as the source to verify that in DB, Gonzalez kissed Meier. Then to verify it one would need to waste time searching through telenovela magazines that say that Gonzalez kissed Meier. Of course such a rule is nonsense when writing about telenovelas and actors in telenovelas. Now where would you find a source on a telenovela or actor in a telenovela, which source is "policed"? (EnochBethany (talk) 06:19, 8 November 2010 (UTC))[reply]

There are some disturbing unsourced defamatory edits present in this article. In addition, unsourced defamatory edits continue to made to this article. A Refimprove tag will be added to this article. As per its infobox instructions, unsourced edits can and will be removed.

Abortion or Aborto?

The article says "Recently had a abortion; & is now married." (That is a string of words with no subject.) What is the proof of the abortion? Apparently the Spanish word "aborto" can mean either abortion or miscarriage. I think that the correct word is miscarriage in this case. As it stands it may be defamatory -- except to the miserable persons who think is is fine to murder babies! Technically, in English "abortion" could be used for a spontaneous loss of baby in the first 3 months. But I think that Gonzalez had a miscarriage at 5 months. At any rate, such a statement requires proof or should not be made. (EnochBethany (talk) 06:06, 8 November 2010 (UTC))[reply]

	An image used in this article, File:EdithII.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion at Wikimedia Commons for the following reason: Copyright violations What should I do?
	Speedy deletions at commons tend to take longer than they do on Wikipedia, so there is no rush to respond. If you feel the deletion can be contested then please do so (commons:COM:SPEEDY has further information). Otherwise consider finding a replacement image before deletion occurs. This notification is provided by a Bot -- talk) 11:20, 5 June 2011 (UTC)[reply ]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Edith González. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20061114135538/http://www.esmas.com/espectaculos/artistas/306485.html to http://www.esmas.com/espectaculos/artistas/306485.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018.

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:59, 7 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]