Talk:Embankment (earthworks)

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Trains Mid‑importance Trains Portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. Soil Mid‑importance Embankment (earthworks) is within the scope of WikiProject Soil, which collaborates on Soil and related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit this article, or visit the project page for more information.SoilWikipedia:WikiProject SoilTemplate:WikiProject SoilSoil articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. Civil engineering Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Civil engineering, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Civil engineering on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Civil engineeringWikipedia:WikiProject Civil engineeringTemplate:WikiProject Civil engineeringCE articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

There are too many articles on the subjects "cut" and "fill" that all seem to cover the same topic. They are all small articles. I think they should be merged into one article with appropriate redirects.

• Cut and fill is 3 KB (508 words)
• Cut (earthmoving)
  is 2 KB (358 words)
• Cutting (transportation)
  is 1 KB (212 words)
• Embankment (transportation)
  is 1 KB (154 words)
• Fill dirt is 2 KB (384 words)

Can't these be merged into one article with the appropriate sections and redirects? - ¢Spender1983 (talk) 02:41, 22 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Seems to be lifted from the