Talk:Environmental politics
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 8 September 2021 and 7 December 2021. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Conradfrench. Peer reviewers: Katieebinger.
Above undated message substituted from
Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment
This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Jesmyth. Peer reviewers: Krs48.
Above undated message substituted from
Re: Proposed merger with political ecology
- The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.
Disagree. Environmental politics is a subfield within political science, while political ecology is an interdisciplinary approach looking at politicized interrelations between states (governments) and local biophysical environments. After decades of scholarship, both are well established in their own right. While it would be appropriate to cross-reference the two entries, merging them would be a disservice to those seeking to understand the respective areas of inquiry. I disagree with the proposed merger.DA Sonnenfeld (talk) 09:55, 16 June 2011 (UTC)
Possible improvements to the page -adding more about laws associated with the environment made by the government -talk about protocols made and important conferences about how to better deal with saving the environment from a political prospective -political parties and their stances on how to help the environment Hmmsefc95 (talk) 22:56, 19 September 2015 (UTC)
External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Environmental politics. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20151208095237/http://carnegieendowment.org/ieb/2012/03/01/choking-on-growth to http://carnegieendowment.org/ieb/2012/03/01/choking-on-growth
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
{{source check
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:27, 24 December 2016 (UTC)
Hello, regarding the Emerging Nations China and India are great examples with great paragraphs, however why were Brazil and Russia mentioned and then not followed up by an in-depth sub-paragraph?AnisaAbdullahi (talk) 21:16, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
Re: Additional Reference
The following reference was added to the last sentence of the third paragraph of 'Democratic challenges': Povitkina, Marina (2018-05-04). "The limits of democracy in tackling climate change". Environmental Politics. 27 (3): 411–432. doi:10.1080/09644016.2018.1444723. ISSN 0964-4016. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Conradfrench (talk • contribs) 15:45, 17 October 2021 (UTC)