Talk:European Alliance
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
.svg){kind=small}
Proposed move
- The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the proposal was moved to
Union for Europe of the Nations–European Alliance (unspaced en dash). Hard to tell from the article, but it seems to describe a merged organization. --BDD (talk) 23:46, 18 June 2013 (UTC)
]
talk) 02:37, 10 June 2013 (UTC)
]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on
nobots
|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/20080421070253/http://ariel.qwentes.be:80/presentation/down/ea/index.html to http://ariel.qwentes.be/presentation/down/ea/index.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018.
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template
}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
{{source check- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—
Talk to my owner:Online 23:44, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
]
Requested move 26 April 2017
- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: MOVED.In absence of any opposition, request is granted.Concerns of failing
notability may be discussed at talk.(non-admin closure) Winged Blades Godric 07:58, 16 May 2017 (UTC)
]
Union for Europe of the Nations–European Alliance → European Alliance – The group currently adopts this name and has adopted it for most of its history (1996–2004 and 2009–present). I know that there is an article named European Alliance right now, but that should be moved to European Alliance (Kosovo), as this article covers the main topic. It is almost an uncontroversial move, but I would like to see a debate. -- Checco (talk) 11:21, 26 April 2017 (UTC) --Relisting. Andrewa (talk) 12:56, 4 May 2017 (UTC)
]
- Support, as per ]
- Relisting comment: This should be a multi-move, but the bot seems to have picked that up and there's already a heads-up at Talk:European Alliance to take care of that. Is there any evidence that the proposed name is the common name rather than just the primary topic for that name? We need both to justify this move. I also note that the article already at European Alliance reads in part the EUA:European alliance wants Kosovo to be a full UN and EU member by 2011. It makes me wonder, do either of these groups really meet the notability tests? Andrewa (talk) 13:08, 4 May 2017 (UTC)]
- Comment. "European Alliance" is the common, and current and long-time official name of the group. It is evidently a primary topic, when compared to Kosovo's party. I hope we can move forward quickly with the move, which is practically incontroversial. --Checco (talk) 20:46, 8 May 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.