Talk:Extraterrestrial UFO hypothesis
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Extraterrestrial UFO hypothesis article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: Index, 1Auto-archiving period: 90 days |
Extraterrestrial UFO hypothesis received a peer review by Wikipedia editors, which is now archived. It may contain ideas you can use to improve this article. |
This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible. | ||
Mid | This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. |
Extraterrestrial UFO hypothesis received a peer review by Wikipedia editors, which on 21 October 2006 was archived. It may contain ideas you can use to improve this article. |
Index
|
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 90 days may be automatically archived by ClueBot III when more than 5 sections are present. |
This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.
Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors |
Geography
The geography section reads like an opinion essay arguing in favor of ETH. It seems clear to me that it conflicts with Wikipedia's policies. I'm curious as to why it hasn't been altered or removed.
- Do you mean that scientists are forbidden to argue in favor of a hypothesis. The things I learn from Wikipedia!
Kortoso (talk) 22:51, 20 November 2013 (UTC)
Fermi Paradox
IMHO, the Fermi paradox ought to be addressed here somehow, especially in light of recent revelations regarding billions and billions of recently discovered habitable planets.
Any ideas regarding treatment? Kortoso (talk) 20:07, 7 November 2013 (UTC)
- Agree. I think the Fermi paradox should be referenced. Not extensively, but with one or two sentences. It could fit into the "opinions of scientists" section. Perhaps elsewhere. Use your best judgment.--GodBlessYou2 (talk) 22:58, 5 January 2015 (UTC)
- Only if some reliably published sources have made such a connection WP:UNDUE -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 01:00, 6 January 2015 (UTC)]
- Only if some reliably published sources have made such a connection
- The connection is made in many, if not most of the sources identified in Fermi Paradox, for example here. Fermi's proposition of his paradox was a direct argument against giving credence to the claims of UFO sightings.--GodBlessYou2 (talk) 03:30, 8 January 2015 (UTC)]
- The connection is made in many, if not most of the sources identified in
- It's a slightly old discussion but considering that the article currently only includes a see-also link to it, I agree that more relevant coverage would be adequate. While the fermi paradox allows the possibility of the universe being populated with other life, it at the same time explains why two civilizations are unlikely to ever discover eachother, considering the rarity and distance in space and/or time. —PaleoNeonate – 10:58, 3 May 2020 (UTC)
- Absolutely, +1 -- {{u|Gtoffoletto}} talk 12:45, 3 May 2020 (UTC)
- It's a slightly old discussion but considering that the article currently only includes a see-also link to it, I agree that more relevant coverage would be adequate. While the fermi paradox allows the possibility of the universe being populated with other life, it at the same time explains why two civilizations are unlikely to ever discover eachother, considering the rarity and distance in space and/or time. —PaleoNeonate – 10:58, 3 May 2020 (UTC)
External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/20071203015119/http://www.scifi.com:80/ufo/roper/05.html to http://www.scifi.com/ufo/roper/05.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018.
{{source check
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—
External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060206064749/http://ncas.sawco.com/ufosymposium/harder.html to http://ncas.sawco.com/ufosymposium/harder.html
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20101125162907/http://mufon.com/MUFONNews/znews_oberth.html to http://www.mufon.com/MUFONNews/znews_oberth.html
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20111124052154/https://wwws.whitehouse.gov/Petitions to https://wwws.whitehouse.gov/petitions
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
{{source check
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:05, 26 September 2017 (UTC)
External links modified (January 2018)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 4 external links on
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20051111004644/http://www.mufon.com/znews_publicopinion.html to http://www.mufon.com/znews_publicopinion.html
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060928234930/http://nai.arc.nasa.gov/astrobio/astrobio_detail.cfm?ID=1538 to http://nai.arc.nasa.gov/astrobio/astrobio_detail.cfm?ID=1538
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060928234811/http://nai.arc.nasa.gov/astrobio/astrobio_detail.cfm?ID=1551 to http://nai.arc.nasa.gov/astrobio/astrobio_detail.cfm?ID=1551
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090716113351/http://www.ufoevidence.org/newsite/files/COMETA_part2.pdf to http://www.ufoevidence.org/newsite/files/COMETA_part2.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
{{source check
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:09, 22 January 2018 (UTC)