Talk:Falaknuma Palace

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Architecture: Historic houses Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by the Historic houses task force (assessed as Low-importance). India: Telangana / History / Hyderabad Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject Telangana (assessed as High-importance). This article is supported by the Indian history workgroup (assessed as Mid-importance). This article is supported by WikiProject Hyderabad (assessed as Mid-importance). This article was last assessed in April 2012.

The information in this article is close to verbatim from the first two references that I found (and added) via Google search. They need paraphrasing. Flyguy649 23:02, 5 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

the infobox hotel is worth removing, as only some portion of the palace is leased to Taj group of hotels, though the main palace is still under descendants of Nizam. ref : http://www.guardian.co.uk/travel/2011/feb/20/taj-falaknuma-palace-nizam ref : http://www.hindu.com/2000/08/03/stories/0403403e.htm ref : http://www.hindustantimes.com/StoryPage/Print/628718.aspx --Omer123hussain (talk) 23:15, 29 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The palace has gone through a lot of 'firsts' and I think it would be interesting to let people know just exactly what those are as a part of trivia knowledge - and also as part of its history. I think it would be a great add-on to list some of the things the palace started. What do you guys think? Deathtap (talk) 14:29, 14 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

There are some cc-licensed photographs of the palace (including some of the interior) available here: http://www.flickr.com/photos/skender/sets/72157635855056404/ Maybe some of them can be used to further illustrate the article with? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.23.194.180 (talk) 20:11, 26 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I saw the palace during the 1990s (till 1997) and can give first hand accounts of certain details pertaining to some 'scandalous' events that occurred during that period (with evidence). Things such as theft, land grabbing, extortion, etc. There is a dark history and took the Taj Group a lot of time and money to finalize the rental agreement they had with the Nizam. Should this be included? 156.149.249.11 (talk) 07:30, 8 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Forbes, history and restoration details :)--Omer123hussain (talk) 13:28, 3 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nat Geo Magazine

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Falaknuma Palace. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080316040430/http://hyderabad.clickindia.com:80/travel/falaknumapalace.html to http://hyderabad.clickindia.com/travel/falaknumapalace.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018.

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:23, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]