Talk:Far Side Virtual

Far Side Virtual is a former featured article candidate. Please view the links under Article milestones below to see why the nomination failed. For older candidates, please check the archive.

Far Side Virtual has been listed as one of the Music good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
June 23, 2013	Good article nominee	Listed
May 24, 2014	Featured article candidate	Not promoted

A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on March 21, 2013.

The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that James Ferraro originally intended to release his 2011 album Far Side Virtual as a set of ringtones?

Current status: Former featured article candidate, current good article

GA Review

This review is
transcluded from Talk:Far Side Virtual/GA1
. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Khazar2 (talk · contribs) 23:18, 21 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I'll be glad to take this review; sorry you've had to wait so long for one. Initial comments to follow in the next 1-3 days. Thanks in advance for your work! -- Khazar2 (talk) 23:18, 21 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Checklist

I see no GA-level issues on an initial pass, so I'll go straight to the checklist here. Thanks for your work on this; it looks quite solid. The only quibble I can find so far, which isn't a GA criteria issue, is that

MOS:QUOTE mostly forbids use of wikilinks inside quotations, which this article does heavily; none of these links seem unreasonable, however. -- Khazar2 (talk) 00:29, 23 June 2013 (UTC)[reply

]

Rate	Attribute	Review Comment
1. Well-written:
	1a. the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct.	Spotchecks show no evidence of copyright issues.
	1b. it complies with the list incorporation .
2. Verifiable with no original research:
	2a. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline .
	2b. reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose).	Some of these publications may be a bit borderline for reliable sources, but I don't see any that seem unacceptable.
	2c. it contains no original research.
3. Broad in its coverage:
	3a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic.
	3b. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style).
	4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each.
	5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute.
6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as audio :
	6a. media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content.
	6b. media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions .	Technically I believe even the infobox image is supposed to have a caption. "Far Side Virtual album cover"? Since this is so basic a point, I'll just take care of this myself.
	7. Overall assessment.	Pass as GA

FAC ping

Please ping me if this article goes back up for FAC in the future and I'll do my best to give it a review czar

♔ 04:30, 22 June 2014 (UTC)[reply

]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Far Side Virtual. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018.

regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check

}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:35, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]