Talk:Far infrared

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Astronomy Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Astronomy, which collaborates on articles related to Astronomy on Wikipedia.AstronomyWikipedia:WikiProject AstronomyTemplate:WikiProject AstronomyAstronomy articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Physics Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Physics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Physics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhysicsWikipedia:WikiProject PhysicsTemplate:WikiProject Physicsphysics articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

I'm getting my PhD in chemistry and will rewrite this page to higher standards as soon as I get a chance including graphics, valid peer reviewed references and better scientific writing.Eframgoldberg (talk) 05:11, 23 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. One of the problems you will face is that there is great variance in the basic definition, for example:

10-1000 µm

Merriam-Webster's Dictionary

http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/far-infrared

2-50 microns (=µm)

The American Heritage® Science Dictionary

about 3.0–1000 µm

Three sources (all from Elsevier -- same editorial staff?)

Dorland's Medical Dictionary for Health Consumers

Miller-Keane Encyclopedia and Dictionary of Medicine, Nursing, and Allied Health

Saunders Comprehensive Veterinary Dictionary

There's a rough correspondence to IR-C

"between 3000 and 1 * 10^6 nm (or 1 mm) is referred to as IR-C"

Millodot: Dictionary of Optometry and Visual Science

All but the first of these are collected at http://medical-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/Far-:infrared.

Bn (talk) 03:56, 1 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I added the first two application sections: astronomy and medicine (although the medicine information was already present). I'll work on finding more applications, but there's still very little theory in this article. --

I would like to expand on the medicinal applications of IR therapy. I feel that the sentence "However, larger and more-rigorous studies are needed to confirm these results" is a matter of opinion. Is anyone opposed to removing this sentence and adding some more factual information? Atsmith227 (talk) 16:58, 15 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I added a small section on the use of far infrared in human body sensors.198.58.150.217 (talk) 20:29, 7 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I added a brief section on therapeutic modalities as this seems to be an emerging option for medical treatment. It's my first time adding anything on wikipedia and would appreciate any feedback. Thanks. (JMM54321) 26 January 2017

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Far infrared. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://archive.is/20120529/http://www.ipac.caltech.edu/Outreach/Edu/Regions/irregions.html to http://www.ipac.caltech.edu/outreach/Edu/Regions/irregions.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018.

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:52, 28 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This diagram at the beginning of the article made by Biomatscience is missing UV spectrum between xray and visible spectrum and thus is not aaccurate. 213.149.61.225 (talk) 00:01, 1 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

That diagram is kind of a train wreck actually. It expands out the range typically called "long-wavelength infrared", but this article is about far infrared. It captions it "Resonant frequency", but then gives the numeric range not in frequency but in wavelength. What is "resonant frequency" even supposed to mean on this diagram? This thing is way worse than useless, would be better to just delete it. 66.76.242.44 (talk) 23:57, 23 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I found a much better image on a Nasa website, but I cant figure out how to format it so it'll look well.

N7fty (talk) 18:20, 2 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]