Talk:Federal territory
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Federal territory article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
Move request
- The following is a closed discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the proposal was move to Federal territory. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 22:53, 2 February 2010 (UTC)
WP:SINGULAR. - BilCat (talk) 05:47, 24 January 2010 (UTC) I'm changing this to a lower case "t" - feel free to state your preferance for either form. - BilCat (talk) 20:41, 24 January 2010 (UTC)
]
- Support per nom. — AjaxSmack 07:34, 24 January 2010 (UTC)
- No objection to this being at Federal Territory (Malaysia), so that article should be returned to its former title without the unnecessary qualifier. Station1 (talk) 00:26, 30 January 2010 (UTC)]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
Notes
Union Territory (India) will probasbly not be moved to Union territory. - BilCat (talk) 23:25, 2 February 2010 (UTC)
]
Merge?
It says on the page that someone has suggested a merge with
Federal District, but there is no explanation why. Are these terms really interchangable? I think a territorry usually is much more vast in size. Lingon of the Dark (talk) 11:13, 1 June 2013 (UTC)
]