Talk:Final offensive of the Spanish Civil War

This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Spain Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Spain, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Spain on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SpainWikipedia:WikiProject SpainTemplate:WikiProject SpainSpain articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. European history This article is within the scope of WikiProject European history, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the history of Europe on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.European historyWikipedia:WikiProject European historyTemplate:WikiProject European historyEuropean history articles ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale. Military history: European / Spanish This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status: Referencing and citation: criterion met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met Associated task forces: /  European military history task force Spanish military history task force

A fact from this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the On this day section on March 26, 2012, March 26, 2014, March 26, 2019, and March 26, 2024.

Good work with this article. I've assessed it as B class. I have a couple of suggestions for some tweaks if you are looking to take it towards GA:

• watch out for inconsistencies in English variation. I spotted a couple: "center" and "Centre", "harbor" and "harbour"; "recognised" and "recognized";
• there are some date format inconsistencies, for instance compare the lead "26 March" to the infobox "March 26";
• in the Notes, there are a couple of minor inconsistencies. For instance you use short citations for most except one for Preston and another couple for Aub. These should probably be made consistent;
• in References the formatting is a little inconsistent, for instance compare Preston, Paul (1995) with all the others.

Anyway, well done. Good luck with taking the article further. Cheers, AustralianRupert (talk) 08:23, 22 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]