Talk:Forest Hills, Pennsylvania
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||
|
Suggestions for Sections to be Added
- History, including first
- Separate section detailing elected officials
- Section describing form of government
- Parks and recreation
- Education
- Businesses
- Notable people and media references (if there are any)
- Climate
Summary of my May 2011 Updates
Added historical populations from the NHGIS
I updated the settlement info box to the newer template, as well as updated the references to use the < ref> tags. There is still a bit of a travel guide feel to the article, which could use some work. I also think if we can get more substance into the article, we could more the demographic information into the info box, as it is just a paragraph of numbers.nChanq (talk) 14:09, 1 June 2011 (UTC)
I added some information, but I'd like to see more. A good goal would be to get this article up to the same quality as the Braddock article. nChanq (talk) 16:41, 31 May 2011 (UTC)
Other Discussion
The last part of this page needs cleaned up. It sounds like it is from a brochure from the borough manager's office.nChanq (talk) 00:32, 22 October 2010 (UTC)
I will continue to update this page to provide a resource for those considering moving to our beautiful Borough. PLEASE do not erase these additions. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.95.203.102 (talk) 20:53, 28 October 2011 (UTC)
A lot of the newer additions add to the "brochure" problem. Please stick to the encyclopedia-style tone; not only does the brochure tone not meet Wikipedia's standards, but it also makes it sounds like we are desperate to attract people to the area with the cheesy descriptions. --nChanq (talk) 08:06, 2 December 2012 (UTC)
External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Forest Hills, Pennsylvania. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added
{{dead link}}
tag to http://www.census.gov/popest/data/cities/totals/2015/SUB-EST2015.html - Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130911234518/http://factfinder2.census.gov to http://factfinder2.census.gov
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131019235623/http://www.census.gov:80/popest/data/cities/totals/2012/SUB-EST2012-3.html to http://www.census.gov/popest/data/cities/totals/2012/SUB-EST2012-3.html
- Added
{{dead link}}
tag to http://factfinder2.census.gov/faces/nav/jsf/pages/searchresults.xhtml?refresh=t
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
{{source check
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:26, 2 January 2017 (UTC)