Talk:Forum of Caesar

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Classical Greece and Rome Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Classical Greece and Rome, a group of contributors interested in Wikipedia's articles on classics. If you would like to join the WikiProject or learn how to contribute, please see our project page. If you need assistance from a classicist, please see our talk page.Classical Greece and RomeWikipedia:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeTemplate:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeClassical Greece and Rome articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. Architecture This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture articles ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

This article was the subject of an educational assignment that ended on 31 May 2007. Further details are available here.

This article is very well-written, easy to read, and communicates the information clearly. I think that a photo or drawing of the city showing where exactly the forum is would prove beneficial and allow the readers to orient themselves. Also, more information about why the artwork was chosen (if there even was a particular reason) would give insight into which gods were important at the time or what Caesar himself valued. Finally, maybe you could mention what still stands of the forum today and how its current condition it. -Alice Magill

good article, very well written. i do think you should change that picture, not necessarily to a diagram of Rome or the Forum Romanum, but at least one that shows more of the Forum itself. you have an entire section dedicated to its reconstruction, and yet, to see a picture of rubble is a little disappointing. also, the section about Caesar and the scultupre of the horse is a bit confusing, too many Caesars! its hard to tell which one you are talking about. -- Mark Nilsson

Good article. The information is well stated, and the article is organized well. I agree that a couple of additional photos would be helpful, both to help the reader to understand where the building was located and if possible a model of what it is supposed to have looked like. It might also be a good idea to go into some of what the archaeologists have unearthed recently. -Peter Moore

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

• Caesarforum.jpg

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 03:26, 19 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]