Talk:Fred Dibnah

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
Good articleFred Dibnah has been listed as one of the Engineering and technology good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
October 31, 2009Good article nomineeListed

Date of birth

Obituaries in The Guardian, The Telegraph, and The Independent all give the d.o.b. as 28 April 1938. In the absence of a

reliable source it should stay like that. Mr Stephen (talk) 15:38, 30 April 2016 (UTC)[reply
]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Fred Dibnah. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018.

regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check
}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:37, 7 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

GA ?

This article has deteriorated since the 2009 GA and I think probably our standards have improved since then also. I have doubts about whether this now qualifies, especially given its substantial reliance on one source. - Sitush (talk) 20:03, 18 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

It's hardly surprising that the two main sources are the two extant biographies. The article remains comprehensive and well referenced and there are no problems with style, grammar, punctuation or spelling. On the other hand I think it would be a good thing generally if WP GAs and FAs were automatically reassessed every few years, as there are undoubtedly some horrors lurking out there. Personally I think this article would survive a GA review but I'm just an ordinary editor, not some WP guru. --Ef80 (talk) 14:15, 27 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Drawings

I think Dibnah's especial skill in technical drawing is worthy of note. Could someone put in a sentence om this, together with a reference to one or more of the broadcasts in which we see his drawings? (I don't have access to any recordings,so I can't do this.)

Regards to all, 79.75.143.232 (talk) 14:06, 23 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 02:06, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

National service

The intro has an unattributed assertion that he served in the Army Catering Corps, but there is a later reference with citation (I don't own the Hall reference to check) that he was in the 14th/20th. Anyone know which is true? It is conceivable that he could have done both, I suppose, but highly unlikely for a national serviceman. CharlesSpencer (talk) 17:39, 3 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Betsy, a steam roller

Commons has a picture of a steamroller with "F Dibnah, Steeplejack, Bolton" painted on it, which might look well in this article.

"Betsy", 1912?

However, the picture claims the steamroller is from 1912 (as does the article

Aveling & Porter). Whereas this article mentions a 1910 Aveling & Porter steamroller, and a 1912 Aveling & Porter traction engine. Also the steamroller was supposed to be named "Allison" after his wife (while "Betsy" in the picture must named after his mother). So I can't just slap the image on because I'd have to figure out the correct date, which I'm not able to do, anybody know which is correct? Possibly this is the "traction engine".  Card Zero  (talk) 21:44, 23 February 2022 (UTC)[reply
]

Looks like it's this one 1912 Aveling & Porter no. 7632, Reg DM3079. Obviously a roller. 86.188.121.44 (talk) 22:07, 23 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]