Talk:Frederiksberg Gardens

This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Denmark Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Denmark, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Denmark on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DenmarkWikipedia:WikiProject DenmarkTemplate:WikiProject DenmarkDenmark articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

The article says that the park is operated by Frederiksberg Kommune. If that is true then it is something quite new and very surprising for me. It is a state-property and operated by Slots- og Ejendomsstyrelsen. I have been working there. Mio Nielsen--82.125.51.191 (talk) 14:34, 29 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Frederiksberg Gardens. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://archive.is/20120804201420/www.frederiksberg.dk/ByOgKultur/Byguide/RundtPaaDetHistoriskeFrederiksberg/FrederiksbergSlotOgHaverne.aspx to http://www.frederiksberg.dk/ByOgKultur/Byguide/RundtPaaDetHistoriskeFrederiksberg/FrederiksbergSlotOgHaverne.aspx

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018.

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:30, 7 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Frederiksberg Gardens. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110609124253/http://www.ses.dk/da/SlotteOgHaver/Slotte/FrederiksbergHaveOgSoendermarken to http://www.ses.dk/da/SlotteOgHaver/Slotte/FrederiksbergHaveOgSoendermarken
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070612160804/http://www.frederiksberg.dk/English/Tourist%20guide/Parks.aspx to http://www.frederiksberg.dk/English/Tourist%20guide/Parks.aspx
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110708200537/http://www.cph-visual.com/gallery/?search_rows=frederiksberg to http://www.cph-visual.com/gallery/?search_rows=frederiksberg

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018.

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:17, 4 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]