Talk:Fredie Blom

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

Recent previous AfD

I looked at the recent previous AfD when reviewing this, and from what I saw the article appeared to have been poorly sourced. This article is in stark contrast to that, with a high number of sources that clearly meet the

WP:GNG. Despite the possible "sketchiness" of the age claim, the subject clearly (in my opinion) meets the GNG. AviationFreak💬 21:02, 17 September 2020 (UTC)[reply
]

AviationFreak, it is a shame that this was done out-of-process. Elizium23 (talk) 21:03, 17 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Elizium23, Could you specify what part of process I ignored? I reached out to Tone, the closing admin, who said I could recreate by going through AFC, which is exactly what I did. Nomming for G4 here (when it isn't similar to the article, I should know) seems to be more out-of-process to me. Of course you can take it back to afd, however. Best, Eddie891 Talk Work 21:05, 17 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Contested deletion

G4 doesn't apply because this article is not substantially similar, and itaddresses issues of the AFD discussion where the sourcing itself was not discussed. See discussion on User_talk:Tone#Fredie_Blom, where I followed the correct procedure for recreating articles after AFD. You can take it back to afd if you like, but G4 absolutely doesn't apply. Best, --Eddie891 Talk Work 21:03, 17 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I am happy that the article has been rewritten in an encyclopediac manner with neutral point of view. I should thank
WP:GNG. Abishe (talk) 02:46, 18 September 2020 (UTC)[reply
]