Talk:Freedom of information in the United Kingdom

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Politics High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale. Politics of the United Kingdom High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics of the United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Politics of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Politics of the United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomPolitics of the United Kingdom articles High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale. Law High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale. Journalism High‑importance Freedom of speech High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Freedom of speech, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Freedom of speech on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Freedom of speechWikipedia:WikiProject Freedom of speechTemplate:WikiProject Freedom of speechFreedom of speech articles High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Either this page should be actually about general freedom of information in the Uk or it should be amalgamated with the article Freedom of Information Act 2000 this one is clearer on some things but is incomplete therefore this would make more sense Freedom of Information Act 2000

There is an important difference; FoIA 2000 covers ~95% of affected bodies, but for the other 5% FoI(S)A 2002 is equally significant - FoIA 2000 is irrelevant for these. If there is a general overview article, here would be better than under the individual 2000 Act article.

talk | 14:19, 4 June 2006 (UTC)[reply

]

This is confusing, and I'm not sure it's very accurate. For example, I'm not sure there's any evidence it was any delay in introducing FOISA that led the Blair government to delay implementation of the UK Act - as far as I remember, it was widely held that the government and civil service were simply unprepared. In fact, it implies that FOISA was introduced to plug a gap in the UK Act - but of course in theory it would have been open to the Scottish Parliament not to introduce an FOI act at all - it's a devolved issue. My proposals would be: the articles on the two separate Acts should stay; this should refer only to FOI at the UK level (England, Wales and Northern Ireland) and a separate article should cover FOI in Scotland. Also, these should be separately listed in the overall Freedom of Information Legislation article. If I get time, I'll try to do this - unless anyone disagrees - but only if I get time... --BenPlouviez 10:20, 17 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I think the page should stay as a general guide to Freedom of Information in the UK. I have added a reference to the Environmental Information Regulations.

John Cross (talk) 10:30, 7 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I agree. I propose to collapse the article down to a few paragraphs, essentially pointing the reader to articles where the subjects are discussed in more depth. There is little point in repeating content. Millstream3 (talk) 10:34, 9 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I agree too. How far have you got ? Happy to help as I have worked more or less full time in FOI since 2005. It's also full of errors. Eggthang (talk) 19:48, 1 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This (new) website allows users to request information under EIR and under the Freedom of Information Act 2000 (using an online form). I was going to add a link to this page but as I has spent some of my spare time as a volunteer I thought I had better ask first bearing in mind

{{Request edit}}

John Cross (talk) 11:36, 7 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done The low popularity of the site in question (e.g. Alexa ranking over 1,100,000) leads me to believe that Wikipedia should not, at this time, be giving it publicity. SHEFFIELDSTEEL^TALK 19:40, 20 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Checking today (16 December 2008) shows Alexa putting it at 496,345. Is this substantial enough? It's already at the bottom of the article in any case. It might make sense for it to come under something wider about the FoI/government transparency 'movement' in the UK - e.g. the various mySociety websites, FoI campaigners etc. (78.86.173.118 (talk) 11:55, 16 December 2008 (UTC))[reply]

We really need some demonstration of

External links guidelines. SHEFFIELDSTEEL^TALK 15:31, 16 December 2008 (UTC)[reply

]

Just an update. I think it is worth noting that about 8.5% of all UK FOI requests are now made through WhatDoTheyKnow.com, the figure rises to about 19% for requests to the Home Office. [1]. The number is likely to rise rather than fall as the site has not been around all that long. John Cross (talk) 20:33, 20 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Freedom of information in the United Kingdom. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080731030954/http://www.labour-party.org.uk/manifestos/1997/1997-labour-manifesto.shtml to http://www.labour-party.org.uk/manifestos/1997/1997-labour-manifesto.shtml

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018.

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:24, 7 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]