Talk:Functional Mock-up Interface

This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Computing This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale. Systems This article is within the scope of WikiProject Systems, which collaborates on articles related to systems and systems science.SystemsWikipedia:WikiProject SystemsTemplate:WikiProject SystemsSystems articles ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale. This article is not associated with a particular field. Fields are listed on the template page.

The title of this section should probably be “Comparison to S-Functions in Simulink”. Also for balance this comparison should also include the advantages of using S-Functions. I can provide this information. Thoughts? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mcarone1 (talk • contribs) 18:45, 30 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Why does this section start talking about ECU with out any explanation or introduction. Is ECU engine control unit? If so then the point is way to specific for this piece and should be expressed in a more general way. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 195.11.240.36 (talk) 11:14, 13 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Following a single source approach I would suggest to remove the tool list and include a link to the FMI webpage instead (https://www.fmi-standard.org/tools). Otherwise one has to keep two lists of tools consistent. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cbertsch (talk • contribs) 21:01, 10 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I think we should leave out the tool list, it's just a link farm at this stage. A link to fmi-standard.org/tools should be fine. Rhodin (talk) 17:02, 11 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20110720233637/http://synchronics.inria.fr/lib/exe/fetch.php/modelica-fmi-elmqvist.pdf to http://synchronics.inria.fr/lib/exe/fetch.php/modelica-fmi-elmqvist.pdf
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20110720233637/http://synchronics.inria.fr/lib/exe/fetch.php/modelica-fmi-elmqvist.pdf to http://synchronics.inria.fr/lib/exe/fetch.php/modelica-fmi-elmqvist.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018.

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—