Talk:GDAL

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the GDAL article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Software which uses GDAL/OGR

I added this new section. Please add an entry for your favorite program which uses GDAL/OGR. — Teratornis 19:36, 22 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

What does ogr stand for?

.. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.145.218.138 (talk) 04:46, 1 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I added a Reference to [[1]] --80.153.109.85 (talk) 11:47, 15 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Gdal should be categorised more than one subject

While the main program is written indeed in c++ gdal has been ported to many other languages as well. Python, java and i think more.

Gdal should also be categorised in geoinformatics category (if such exists) because its abilities to manipulate relevent data. Stimpak (talk) 21:34, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on GDAL. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110823150539/http://ojs.info.gscc.osaka-cu.ac.jp/JI/include/getdoc.php?id=133&article=36&mode=pdf to http://ojs.info.gscc.osaka-cu.ac.jp/JI/include/getdoc.php?id=133&article=36&mode=pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018.

regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check

}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:04, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]