Talk:Gary Sambrook

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Politics of the United Kingdom This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics of the United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Politics of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Politics of the United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomPolitics of the United Kingdom articles ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale. Biography: Politics and Government This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles This article is supported by the politics and government work group.

Daily pageviews of this article A graph should have been displayed here but graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at pageviews.wmcloud.org

 Done

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

In the section 'In October 2020, Sambrook voted against extending free school meals to eligible children during school holidays.[6] This could have helped over 6,000 children within his constituency.[7] In response, a vicious graffito appeared in his constituency reading "Gary Sambrook eats big dinners".[8]' Remove the unnecessary word 'vicious' as it is subjective and there is no evidence to support it. Philistine055 (talk) 21:40, 26 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Removed. DuncanHill (talk) 22:01, 26 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"This could have helped over 6,000 children within his constituency" is not a neutral statement, given that it indicates that 6000 children went unhelped. That particular sentence should probably just be deleted. /Julle (talk) 23:30, 26 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I'd normally have waited longer, but since this was a (perceived) POV problem in a BLP article, I went ahead and removed it now. Politics can always benefit one group or another; we normally don't indicate a decision as a refusal to help someone. /Julle (talk) 10:41, 27 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop reverting simple grammar changes, if you require explaination of why grammar edits have been made, speak about it on the talk page before reversion.