Talk:Gaza Seaport plans

Merge proposal

Any valid material should be added to Port of Gaza. There is absolutely no reason to have two separate articles about the same location, both of them a few paragraphs long. Any development plans can be added in a section called just that: Development plans. Furthermore, this article is filled with original research, based on "Power point presentations" and other primary sources that are invalid on Wikipedia.--Geewhiz (talk) 15:49, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

No, completely different issues. Planned Port is on a different location. Existing port is mentioned nowhere in this context. Most importantly, in the context of peace negotiations there is consistently spoken about the construction of a seaport as if there currently exists no one at all. --Wickey-nl (talk) 17:15, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Change into Gaza Seaport plan is OK. --Wickey-nl (talk) 12:27, 11 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Citation #8 references a dead link

FYI: Citation #8 references a dead link — Preceding unsigned comment added by 199.129.206.178 (talk) 13:35, 12 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Gaza Seaport plans. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131004232023/http://unispal.un.org/UNISPAL.NSF/0/C9A5AA5245D910BB852570BB0051711C to http://unispal.un.org/UNISPAL.NSF/0/C9A5AA5245D910BB852570BB0051711C

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018.

regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check

}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:24, 8 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]