Talk:Glenn Martin, DDS

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Animation: American / Canadian / Stop motion Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Animation, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to animation on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, help out with the open tasks, or contribute to the discussion.AnimationWikipedia:WikiProject AnimationTemplate:WikiProject AnimationAnimation articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by the American animation work group (assessed as Low-importance). This article is supported by the Canadian animation work group (assessed as Low-importance). This article is supported by the Stop motion work group (assessed as Low-importance). United States: Animation / Television Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject Animation - American animation work group (assessed as Mid-importance). This article is supported by American television task force (assessed as Mid-importance). Television Low‑importance Television: Nickelodeon Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by the Nickelodeon task force (assessed as Low-importance).

It's actually not a movie, as the article states, but rather a new weekly tv show.

In addition, it is not only produced by Adam Pava, but the following other writer/producers as well: Aron Abrams - consulting producer. Steve Baldikoski - co-executive producer. Bryan Behar - co-executive producer. J.B. Cook - consulting producer. Michael Eisner - executive producer. Eric Fogel - xecutive producer. Sivert Glarum - executive producer. Michael Jamin - executive producer. Adam Pava - producer. Gregory Thompson - consulting producer. Jennifer Joyce is a writer of two episodes, but all the above producers are writers as well.

It was created by Alex Berger and Michael Eisner.

Please update.—Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.167.182.72 (talk) 20:11, 14 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Updated, retagged, needs expanding now (tagged as such).Ejfetters (talk) 10:48, 22 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

No I believe the show's rating will vary from TV-PG DLSV to TV-14 DLSV like Malcolm in the Middle Matthew Cantrell (talk) 21:05, 18 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

However, the article's reasoning (that it's aimed towards an older teen audience) seems quite unlikely, seeing as it's written in a way that derides young people. It's obviously directed at a middle-aged audience. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.73.70.113 (talk) 22:13, 18 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I actually saw an episode of this show on Comedy Central as I was channel surfing, it aired on its regular slot on Nick @ Nite just one hour prior. Since Com Central and Nick are owned by Viacom, is this worth mentioning/noting at all?--Mackdanny (talk) 11:39, 19 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I like this section "Part of the criticism was levelled at the use of laugh tracks as a way to let the audience know something was supposed to be funny, even if it wasn't." First off there are no misspellings and funny isn't subjective.68.38.50.128 (talk) 00:24, 25 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Who's the wise guy that put the picture of the Glenn Martin's RV on this page? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.31.61.65 (talk) 19:41, 25 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Look in the mirror, Randal. Americasroof (talk) 19:49, 25 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

69.235.25.144 (talk) 06:17, 26 August 2009 (UTC) posted the entire New York Daily News review from http://www.nydailynews.com/entertainment/tv/2009/08/17/2009-08-17_nick_at_nites_new_animated_series_glenn_martin_dds_with_kevin_nealon_is_satire_w.html Since this is a copyright violation I removed it but I did include a blurb in the article. If you want to post other reviews put a section in the article. Americasroof (talk) 13:28, 26 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Where is it? hurr hurr. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.31.87.45 (talk) 01:06, 10 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, we don't say swear like "hurr hurr" here buster. I'm just gonna have to report you!-Hee Hee Hee Heeee! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.140.62.202 (talk) 01:46, 15 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

It says that it airs on Nickelodeon. This is not true, Nickelodeon is a kids channel, it airs on

They do share the same panel space (much like

Teletoon did with Teletoon at Night, or how YTV used to broadcast stuff like Ninja Scroll, probably on Bionix) but are technically distinct channels so I see your point. 64.228.90.1 (talk) 12:42, 26 August 2015 (UTC)[reply

]

Alex Berger

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

I don't think that the Alex Berger who produced this show is the Alex Berger whom the link directs to. If this is not the correct place to submit this comment, please accept my apologies in advance. 2001:1713:EA72:BAB0:849E:6972:8E22:3473 (talk) 09:15, 9 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I think you're right. I've removed that link. Trivialist (talk) 10:12, 9 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]