Talk:Global Warming Pollution Reduction Act of 2007

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

United States Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Climate change Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Climate change, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Climate change on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Climate changeWikipedia:WikiProject Climate changeTemplate:WikiProject Climate changeClimate change articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. If you are looking for ways to improve this article, we recommend checking out our recommended sources and our style guide

This article lacks allot of material that I am planning to improve. With respect to the Wiki article grading policy, It lacks enough content about the Global warming pollution reduction Act of 2007. Therefore I will add more detail about the policy its self. Also I will improve its design/look or orientation, in terms of where material is placed etc. Further more the article lacks any kind of graphics and pictures or chats in favor or against the Act, which i intend to improve. As per Wiki grading score, the article is biased or one sided, thus I am planning on adding material to support, against and a critique section of the Act as well. The article also lacks enough references and futher links of useful or supporting information for the content, also the latter will be inproved massively.smatovu (talk)

An image used in this article, File:Worninglogo.JPG, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests April 2012 What should I do? Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so. If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use) If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used. To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant image page (File:Worninglogo.JPG) This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image -- talk) 01:07, 14 April 2012 (UTC)[reply ]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Global Warming Pollution Reduction Act of 2007. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080212000544/http://www.environmentaldefense.org/page.cfm?tagID=1075 to http://www.environmentaldefense.org/page.cfm?tagID=1075

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018.

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:49, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! I plan on editing this article to enhance readability and allow this page to embody wiki's guidelines. As of now, to understand the article, one would need some knowledge of the process/jargon associated with passing a law. Edits needed are less of formatting, but more so in copyediting/sentence structure. The bibliography is fair. I think focusing on enhancing readability is crucial for this article. There are some stylistic issues. I plan to remove the final two sections "final statement" and "importance of government involvement," as they violate wikipedia's purpose of being encyclopedic/express a biased opinion. With that, the citation #15 should be removed along with it's content in the final section. Eventually, more content from someone who is more familiar with the subject would be super beneficial!

Handrews.000 (talk) 01:07, 19 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]