Talk:Good Housekeeping

This  level-5 vital article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Magazines Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Magazines, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of magazines on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MagazinesWikipedia:WikiProject MagazinesTemplate:WikiProject Magazinesmagazine articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. See WikiProject Magazines' writing guide for tips on how to improve this article. United States Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Looking for the article on page 56 of Sept 2007 GH MAGAZINE. (I tore out the pages of that magazine when I was in the nail salon with management's consent but promptly lost it.) The article was regarding make up for women over 40. I loved all the ideas. Wynona Judd was on the cover. Would it be possible to obtain that article somehow?

my email address is [email protected]

Thanks in advance,

Barbara Pharries —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.140.17.183 (talk) 04:58, 2 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Ms. Pharries:

Please check with your local library microfiche catalog first. Then, if necessary, ask a reference librarian where you could get a copy of page 56 of the September 2007 issue. Geraldshields11 (talk) 16:15, 12 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

According to Step Brothers movie, this is the best non-porn magazine to jerk off to.

How is this comment an improvement to culture and creation of wikipedia articles? Geraldshields11 (talk) 16:11, 12 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

In all candour, this comment still beats a lot of the turf-warring and self-stroking that passes for our "culture" on WP. Particularly in its lack of bad-faith. Laodah 19:45, 9 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Good Housekeeping. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060228023817/http://www.goodhousekeeping.co.uk/ghi-info.php to http://www.goodhousekeeping.co.uk/ghi-info.php

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018.

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:30, 21 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Good Housekeeping. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080104213915/http://www.goodhousekeeping.com/home/products/100-anniversary-GHRI-1001 to http://www.goodhousekeeping.com/home/products/100-anniversary-GHRI-1001
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070129120532/http://www.goodhousekeeping.com/consumer/institute/articles/0,,284511_290570,00.html to http://www.goodhousekeeping.com/consumer/institute/articles/0,,284511_290570,00.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120303131221/http://www.cookingchanneltv.com/drop-5-lbs-with-good-housekeeping/index.html to http://www.cookingchanneltv.com/drop-5-lbs-with-good-housekeeping/index.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018.

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:07, 21 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The page says the UK edition started in 1922, but I have in front of me what I think is the first edition which is dated May 1906. Should I remove the dates, even though they are cited? Talltim (talk) 13:32, 21 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

What a disgrace. Someone needs to correct that. MightyArms (talk) 19:10, 19 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]