Talk:Gotham by Gaslight

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Comics: DC Comics / Batman Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Comics, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to comics on Wikipedia. Get involved! If you would like to participate, you can help with the current tasks, visit the notice board, edit the attached article or discuss it at the project's talk page.ComicsWikipedia:WikiProject ComicsTemplate:WikiProject ComicsComics articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Related work groups: /  This article is supported by DC Comics work group. This article is supported by Batman work group. London Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject London, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of London on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LondonWikipedia:WikiProject LondonTemplate:WikiProject LondonLondon-related articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Gotham by Gaslight is NOT steampunk. Enough with that label.

A reasonable opinion but don't remove everything (stub tags, other categories, etc.). (Emperor 00:28, 31 October 2006 (UTC))[reply]

I agree Gotham by Gaslight isn't steampunk; it's a "straight" Victorian setting. Master of the Future, though, has a zepplin with a death-ray and a mechanical pilot... Daibhid C 12:34, 15 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah GbG is more in the "gaslight" genre. I added MotF in after the first person commented as it made sense to have it here and it does clinch the steampunk label. If it were removed to its own section it might take the steampunk aspects with it but fo now I'd suggest it can stay here. (Emperor 13:00, 15 November 2006 (UTC))[reply]

Since the title isn't Batman: Gotham by Gaslight, and doesn't really include Batman anywhere in it, I'm proposing it get moved to Gotham by Gaslight, and this page redirect back there (instead of the opposite, which is what exists now) Darquis 04:13, 21 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I got to here via a link on the Infinite Crisis game page, due to the fact that the setting introduced in this Elseworlds comic was used as a setting for the game as well, with the Gaslight version of Batman and several other new characters from the setting used as playable characters. While I was reading about that inclusion on here though, I noticed that the game was referenced as "due in 2014". In actual fact, the game -- now released -- came out in 2015 according to the page on it. I wasn't able to explain this fully in my edit note, as I accidentally saved the edit before I could finish typing it, but I wanted to make sure the full explanation was attached to it, as I wanted to also justify the wording of it as a "2015 DC game" rather than a "new DC game...due in 2014/due in 2015". The game was released to Steam on March 26, 2015 according to the page on it. 97.102.82.96 (talk) 08:18, 23 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I think

I have just modified one external link on Gotham by Gaslight. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080302183712/http://www.comicon.com/cgi-bin/ultimatebb.cgi?ubb=get_topic%3Bf%3D36%3Bt%3D006842 to http://www.comicon.com/cgi-bin/ultimatebb.cgi?ubb=get_topic%3Bf%3D36%3Bt%3D006842

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018.

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:54, 23 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]