Talk:Grampian Mountains

This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Scotland High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Scotland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Scotland and Scotland-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ScotlandWikipedia:WikiProject ScotlandTemplate:WikiProject ScotlandScotland articles High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale. the hills and mountains of Great Britain and Ireland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.British and Irish hillsWikipedia:WikiProject British and Irish hillsTemplate:WikiProject British and Irish hillsBritish and Irish hills articles

	UK geography High‑importance
High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Text about two crossings of the Grampian Mountains with some of the history of the area

A noteworthy historic route connecting Aberdeen to southern coastal points was called the, an elevated stonework structure in many locations because of the crossing of numerous

trackway was taken by the Roman army on their march northward from Raedykes to Normandykes

.

The text may be better in Causey Mounth and Elsick Mounth, but should be kept. Finavon (talk) 06:37, 11 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Without a map, the average non-Scottish user is at pretty much of a loss, since little-known places are given to indicate the location. The text says NE Scotland, but then it says Ben Nevis is in the range. Isn't Ben Nevis in the west (it's almost on the west coast)? Kdammers (talk) 12:08, 17 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Agree with above. This article is crying out for a map. The article is confusing as well. Do the Grampians include the Cairngorms, or are they completely separate? Why is the main picture in the article of the Cairngorms? A map would help sort this out. Tigerboy1966 (talk) 10:24, 19 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

So now we have a map (as of 10/10/14 19.12 UTC), so all the discussion of ambiguity is of academic interest. I am very satisfied with the statement that the Grampian Mountains stand between the Great Glen and the Highland Boundary fault, and therefore include Ben Nevis, Ben Lomond and the Cairngorms. There is no need to insist that the Cairngorms are somehow separate, they are a local area, as are the Monadhliath, the Mounth and the Trossachs. This is made clear by the map. IMHO the section on location should start with a statement of fact, as illustrated by the map, and explain that ambiguity has dogged this definition, particularly in the 20th Century.--Curamach (talk) 19:16, 10 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The absence of geological information is glaring. These granite mountains are many millions of years old. Something needs to be added about this, I think. ~ P-123 (talk) 08:59, 27 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikipedia article on Northwest Highlands says it's a region. But this article says "The other major mountain ranges in Scotland are the Northwest Highlands and the Southern Uplands." Polar Apposite (talk) 17:01, 16 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Lochaber is not in the list of subranges for the Grampians. Should it be added? Polar Apposite (talk) 17:13, 16 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]