Talk:Gregorian Tower

Gregorian Tower has been listed as one of the Art and architecture good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: August 19, 2013. (Reviewed version).

A fact from Gregorian Tower appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 17 May 2013 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows: Did you know... that observations made with the sundial at the Gregorian Tower of Vatican City provided essential confirmation of the need to reform the Julian calendar? A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2013/May. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Gregorian Tower.

This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Architecture Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. European Microstates: Vatican City This article is within the scope of WikiProject European Microstates, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of European Microstates on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.European MicrostatesWikipedia:WikiProject European MicrostatesTemplate:WikiProject European MicrostatesEuropean Microstates articles ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject Vatican City (assessed as Low-importance).

I see someone else is now working on this so I'll just point out here that The Secret Archives of the Vatican has lots more info, starting with this page. Yngvadottir (talk) 17:33, 8 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This review is

transcluded from Talk:Gregorian Tower/GA1

. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: QatarStarsLeague (talk · contribs) 21:19, 15 August 2013 (UTC) Absolutely! I am preoccupied with some other reviews, so it may take a few days to start. QatarStarsLeague (talk) 21:19, 15 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Lead & infobox

"Tower of the Winds" seems to be a recognized name for the structure, it should be emboldened.

• Done

Early history

Pass here.

Second stage

You refer to this as the second stage of improvements. However, as it is presented, this is only the first stage of improvements, although it is the second stage of construction. This tense should be altered throughout the article.

• Yes, changed

Third stage

"...donations from Hicks of London, and the automatic..." Is/was this a fellow observatory, another scholastic/academic institution, an individual, or another entity?
"...were procured from Richard in Paris." I ask the same question as above.

^It is difficult to clarify this. This book reference [1] also gives the names as "Hicks of London" and "Richard of Paris" only with no more details of who they were. I have done a lot of Google search but could come out with this reference [2] which only vaguely mentions "Amy Hick of London." I could not get any link to 'Richard of Parsi'. In view of this, the second sentence could be changed to read "High quality instruments including the automatic recording instruments were procured, partly with generous donations."

Fourth stage

Pass here.

Features

Another pass here.

Conclusion

This was a fascinating article to review. Once everything of matter is fixed, it shall pass as a GA. Congratulations! QatarStarsLeague (talk) 01:14, 19 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

• I have collaborated with Dr. Blofeld on many articles including this. I have addressed all issues except the names of donors of instruments "Hicks of London" and "Richards of Paris". I have suggested an alternative formulation, if you agree, for incorporation in the article. Thanks for the review.--Nvvchar. 05:38, 19 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Given the book references, the sentence may remain unaltered, just so long as you place the reference mentioned above directly after the sentence in question. QatarStarsLeague (talk) 12:07, 19 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks both! ♦ Dr. Blofeld 07:45, 19 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

• I have now added the book reference at the end of the second sentence under section "Third Stage".--Nvvchar. 14:23, 19 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Gregorian Tower. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130702183252/http://www.archiviosegretovaticano.va/en/archivio/ambienti/torre-dei-venti/ to http://www.archiviosegretovaticano.va/en/archivio/ambienti/torre-dei-venti/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018.

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:07, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]