Talk:Grob G 120TP

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Grob G 120TP article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic. New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help. Assume good faith Be polite and avoid personal attacks Be welcoming to newcomers Seek dispute resolution if needed Article policies Neutral point of view No original research Verifiability

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

This article is written in British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Aviation: Aircraft This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status: Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met This article is supported by the aircraft project. Germany Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Germany, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Germany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GermanyWikipedia:WikiProject GermanyTemplate:WikiProject GermanyGermany articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Daily pageviews of this article A graph should have been displayed here but graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at pageviews.wmcloud.org

has released certification documentation that demonstrates the Wiki Spec for the G120TP is out of date. http://easa.europa.eu/document-library/type-certificates/easaa565-0 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ecojet (talk • contribs) 19:16, 19 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki currently reads like an advertorial for the Grob 120TP and has only 3 links to less than comparable aircraft.

Attempt to add more relevant info was deleted, namely the "see also" links:

Pilatus PC7 Mk2: a direct competitor in Indian Air Force trainer competition: http://www.pilatus-aircraft.com/#45

Aermacchi SF260TP: Same role, same engine as Grob 120TP: http://www.flightglobal.com/news/articles/pictures-alenia-aermacchi-offers-new-generation-sf-260tp-381613/

RFB Fantrainer FT600 / Fanjet: Same engine and same role and same aerospace industry (Germany) as G120TP: http://www.fanjetaviation.com/

CT4 Trainer as used by RAAF and RNZAF in competition with G120TP for UK's MFTS: http://www.aerospace.co.nz/aircraft/ct-4-airtrainer/description

BlackShape 115: CRFP +6.5/-3G aerobatic two seat trainer: http://www.blackshapeaircraft.com/en/training-systems.html — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ecojet (talk • contribs) 19:29, 19 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The problem wasn't with the choice of comparable aircraft, the problem was you added only redlinks to the "see also" section. Redlinks are not used in the "see also" section, because a reader can't "see also" an article that doesn't exist. - Ahunt (talk) 13:41, 20 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

• Grob G120TP - Serial 1188 - Bangladesh Air Force - VGHS.jpg

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 02:37, 2 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

• Grob G120TP - 1176 - Bangladesh Air Force - VGHS.jpg

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 20:52, 10 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]