Talk:Gunhild Stordalen

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles

Norway

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Norway, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Norway on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.NorwayWikipedia:WikiProject NorwayTemplate:WikiProject NorwayNorway articles

Women

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WomenWikipedia:WikiProject WomenTemplate:WikiProject WomenWikiProject Women articles

Bias

This biography has recently been started, and is so far expanded beyond significance with intense use of POV language, by the

SPA EriHal, who has also written about Stordalen's husband Petter Stordalen, and might be a PR consultant connected to the couple. --Orland (talk) 17:45, 26 September 2011 (UTC)[reply

]

SPA user

bias}}. Bw --Orland (talk) 16:16, 29 March 2013 (UTC)[reply

]

Sockpuppets bloating the article with promotional language

I believe the following editors who contributed to this article are sockpuppets and

talk) 12:13, 21 June 2013 (UTC)[reply

]

Can you see any factual errors?

Can you see any factual errors in the article? Give any! Bloating language? Can't see any. It seems that your criticism is politically motivated. A POV criticism. Take a break!--Jidu Boite (talk) 09:20, 9 November 2013 (UTC)you[reply]

I cleaned up the article a little bit yesterday, so maybe your comment indicates that it helped. There was a certain promotional, peacock tone and presentation, and I tried to remove most of it, but I don't think I got all. I am still not happy with the quality of the article but it may not be much worse than several other Wikipedia articles. Personally I am not against removing the tags - or maybe just leave the "general quality" tag. (As a sidenote; this article got my attention, becaus Stordalen was guest in the same tv-show yesterday as Jimmy Wales). Regards, Iselilja (talk) 09:38, 9 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

One factual error: Her wedding dress is not displayed at The Norwegian Museum of Art Industry. It was part of a temporary wedding dress exhibition there in 2011. She had only lent her dress to the museum for that special occasion. This was mentioned in the printed version of the newspaper Adresseavisen: «Mona Grudt og Gunhild Anker Stordalen er blant kvinnene som har lånt bort brudekjolene sine til Nordenfjeldske Kunstindustrimuseums nye utstilling» (= M.G. and G.A.S. are among the women who have lent their wedding dresses to NKIM's new exhibition). I removed the information from the article. Kjersti Lie (talk) 15:14, 9 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]