Talk:Haas F1 Team

This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Formula One High‑importance This article is part of WikiProject Formula One, an attempt to improve and standardize articles related to Formula One, including drivers, teams and constructors, events and history. Feel free to join the project and help with any of the tasks or consult the project page for further information. View the task list Discuss the project Help out with Portal:Formula OneFormula OneWikipedia:WikiProject Formula OneTemplate:WikiProject Formula OneFormula One articles High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale. United States Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

How is it logical that HRD that fields the Truck Series team is not the same HRD that is preparing to field the Formula One team, when they are the same team using the same name owned by the same person? - The Bushranger _{One ping only} 07:21, 12 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I covered this on your talk page, but I will put it here in case anyone else has the same question:

A team has three names - the trading name, which is the name the team registers under as a business; the constructor name, which is the name the FIA credits all results to; and the formal name, which is the name the team uses to refer to themselves, usually with title sponsors.

The FIA statement refers to the team as "Haas Formula LLC". The most important part here is the "LLC", which means the team is a

Newman Haas Racing

and so on and so forth).

The reason why I bring all of this up is because Gene Haas has gone on the record saying that the Formula 1 team will be a completely separate entity to his NASCAR operations. Therefore, we have to consider the team as being run by Haas Formula LLC, even though

WP:COMMONNAME

dictates that the article title is Haas Racing Developments.

With that in mind, when it comes to the #00 truck, it might be entered under the name "Haas Racing Developments", but that Haas Racing Developments is not the same as this Haas Racing Developments unless it can be demonstrated that truck #00 is being entered and operated by Haas Formula LLC, using Haas Formula LLC assets.

That might sound pedantic, but if the truck is not being entered by this team, then it is misleading to include that content. Prisonermonkeys (talk) 01:02, 13 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I created a disambiguation page for Haas F1 take a look if you think its needed. Speedy Question Mark (talk) 17:14, 12 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Personally I'm not convinced it's needed, but I don't think it's doing any harm. In future it might be better to ask before creating a page, so that if consensus is that it's not needed, it doesn't need to be deleted. DH85868993 (talk) 10:38, 13 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

about the sentence:

On July 20, 2019, Lightning Volt (formally Rich Energy) announced that branding for Lightning Volt will not be present on the Haas cars for the German Grand Prix, citing ongoing legal issues.[40]

the source is an article on an obscure blog that simply repost a tweet for a (parody?) account "LightningVoltF1", self-claimed "Official Twitter Account" without blue verified badge. --valepert (talk) 19:59, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I've removed it as they were entered with Rich Energy and carried the rich energy name on their cars. SSSB (talk) 20:48, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry for the mistake I made in the undo. Please fix the vandalized page. Thanks! AMitzikarlA•Let's talk• — Preceding undated comment added 14:18, 24 January 2021‎

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

This page is being rapidly edited with unconstructive and destructive edits. Semi-Protected status should be applied immediately.

Xprts (talk) 09:20, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comment – A request has already been made at

WP:RPP. The timeliness of the protection will depend on admin activity, so until one is available to apply protections, the only course of action is to revert any vandalism. Zappa⚡Matic 09:23, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[reply

]

 Not done: @

WP:RPP.
SSSB (talk) 09:24, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[reply

]

Recently Haas announced it will drop the Uralkali branding. It should be included here somewhere, but I think it should be discussed first. What words to use and what section to put it in etc. Klrfl (talk) 07:37, 25 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

It should be in the 2022 section and the wording should be something along the lines of "Haas dropped the branding of

2022 Russian invasion of Ukraine." SSSB (talk) 09:06, 25 February 2022 (UTC)[reply

]

• FIA Flag.svg

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 13:37, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:

• MoneyGram Haas F1 Team logo 2023.png

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 14:22, 4 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]